Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Feb;45(1):34-42.
doi: 10.1007/s40596-020-01327-5. Epub 2020 Oct 27.

Reimagining Merit and Representation: Promoting Equity and Reducing Bias in GME Through Holistic Review

Nicolás E Barceló  1 , Sonya Shadravan  2 , Christine R Wells  2 , Nichole Goodsmith  3 , Brittany Tarrant  2 , Trevor Shaddox  2 , Yvonne Yang  2 , Eraka Bath  2 , Katrina DeBonis  2
Affiliations
Review

Reimagining Merit and Representation: Promoting Equity and Reducing Bias in GME Through Holistic Review

Nicolás E Barceló et al. Acad Psychiatry. 2021 Feb.

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the capacity of a holistic review process in comparison with non-holistic approaches to facilitate mission-driven recruitment in residency interview screening and selection, with particular attention to the promotion of race equity for applicants underrepresented in medicine (URM).

Methods: Five hundred forty-seven applicants to a psychiatry residency program from US allopathic medical schools were evaluated for interview selection via three distinct screening rubrics-one holistic approach (Holistic Review; HR) and two non-holistic processes: Traditional (TR) and Traditional Modified (TM). Each applicant was assigned a composite score corresponding to each rubric, and the top 100 applicants in each rubric were identified as selected for interview. Odds ratios (OR) of selection for interview according to URM status and secondary outcomes, including clinical performance and lived experience, were measured by analysis of group composition via univariate logistic regression.

Results: Relative to Traditional, Holistic Review significantly increased the odds of URM applicant selection for interview (TR-OR: 0.35 vs HR-OR: 0.84, p < 0.01). Assigning value to lived experience and de-emphasizing USMLE STEP1 scores contributed to the significant changes in odds ratio of interview selection for URM applicants.

Conclusions: Traditional interview selection methods systematically exclude URM applicants from consideration without due attention to applicant strengths or potential contribution to clinical care. Conversely, holistic screening represents a structural intervention capable of critically examining measures of merit, reducing bias, and increasing URM representation in residency recruitment, screening, and selection.

Keywords: Admissions; Diversity; Equity; GME; Holistic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Talamantes E, Henderson M, Fancher T, Mullan F. Closing the gap - making medical school admissions more equitable. N Engl J Med. 2019;380:803–5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Deville C, Hwang W-T, Burgos R, Chapman C, Both S, Thomas CR. Diversity in graduate medical education in the United States by race, ethnicity, and sex, 2012. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175:1706–9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. An American Crisis. The growing absence of black men in medicine and science. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2018.
    1. Komaromy M, Grumbach K, Drake M, Vranizan K, Lurie N, Keane D, et al. The role of Black and Hispanic physicians in providing health care for underserved populations. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:1305–10. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Walker KO, Moreno G, Grumbach K. The association among specialty, race, ethnicity, and practice location among California physicians in diverse specialties. J Natl Med Assoc. Elsevier Masson SAS. 2012;104:46–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0027-9684(15)30126-7 . - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources