Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec;22(6):747-755.
doi: 10.1111/cid.12958. Epub 2020 Oct 28.

Comparative accuracy of cone-beam CT and conventional multislice computed tomography for real-time navigation in zygomatic implant surgery

Baoxin Tao  1 , Yihan Shen  1 , Yuanyuan Sun  1 , Wei Huang  2 , Feng Wang  2 , Yiqun Wu  1
Affiliations

Comparative accuracy of cone-beam CT and conventional multislice computed tomography for real-time navigation in zygomatic implant surgery

Baoxin Tao et al. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2020 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and conventional multislice CT (MSCT) are both used in zygomatic implant navigation surgery but the superiority of one technique versus the other remains unclear.

Purpose: This study compared the accuracy of CBCT and MSCT in zygomatic implant navigation surgery by calculating the deviations of implants.

Material and methods: Patients with severely atrophic maxillae were classified into two groups according to the use of CBCT- or MSCT-guided navigation system. The entry and apical distance deviation, and the angle deviation of zygomatic implants were measured on fused operation images. A linear effect model was used for analysis, with statistical significance set at P < .05.

Results: A total of 72 zygomatic implants were inserted as planned in 23 patients. The comparison of deviations in CBCT and MSCT groups showed a mean (± SD) entry deviation of 1.69 ± 0.59 mm vs 2.04 ± 0.78 mm (P = .146), apical deviation of 2 ± 0.68 mm vs 2.55 ± 0.85 (P < .001), and angle deviation of 2.32 ± 1.02° vs 3.23 ± 1.21° (P = .038).

Conclusion: Real-time zygomatic implant navigation surgery with CBCT may result in higher values for accuracy than MSCT.

Keywords: accuracy; computer-assisted surgery; edentulous maxillae; real-time navigation surgery; zygomatic implants.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

REFERENCES

    1. Chrcanovic BR, Pedrosa AR, Neto Custodio AL. Zygomatic implants: a critical review of the surgical techniques. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013;17:1-9.
    1. Schramm A, Gellrich NC, Schimming R, Schmelzeisen R. Computer-assisted insertion of zygomatic implants (Branemark system) after extensive tumor surgery. [Article in German]. Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir. 2000;4(5):292-295.
    1. Xiaojun C, Yanping L, Yiqun W, Chengtao W. Computer-aided oral implantology: methods and applications. J Med Eng Technol. 2007;31(6):459-467.
    1. Wu Y, Wang F, Huang W, Fan S. Real-time navigation in zygomatic implant placement: workflow. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2019;31(3):357-367.
    1. Vercruyssen M, Fortin T, Widmann G, Jacobs R, Quirynen M. Different techniques of static/dynamic guided implant surgery: modalities and indications. Periodontol 2000. 2014;66(1):214-227.

Substances

LinkOut - more resources