Differentiating between non-functioning pituitary macroadenomas and sellar meningiomas using ADC
- PMID: 33112805
- PMCID: PMC7774768
- DOI: 10.1530/EC-20-0434
Differentiating between non-functioning pituitary macroadenomas and sellar meningiomas using ADC
Abstract
Introduction and aim: It is difficult to distinguish between non-functioning pituitary macroadenomas (NFPMAs) and sellar meningiomas because of their overlapping imaging manifestations on routine MRI, especially in cases of meningiomas growing into the saddle. Here, we aimed to differentiate between these two tumors using apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and MRI characteristics.
Methods: A total of 60 NFPMA and 52 sellar meningioma cases confirmed by the pathological analysis were retrospectively reviewed. All patients were examined via routine MRI and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) before undergoing surgery. The clinical characteristics, MRI characteristics, and max ADC (ADCmax), average ADC (ADCmean), and minimum ADC (ADCmin) values were compared between the two tumors via Chi-square test and two sample t-tests. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and binary logistic regression analyses were conducted to determine the discrimination ability.
Results: The ADCmax, ADCmean, and ADCmin values were significantly higher in NFPMAs compared to sellar meningiomas (P < 0.001 for all). Among ADC values, ADCmax demonstrated good performance with an AUC of 0.896 (95% CI, 0.823-0.969) and accuracy of 88.7%. A cut-off value of 0.97 × 10-3 mm2/s was used for ADCmax for differentiation between tumors. A combination of ADCmax values and clinicoradiological features showed the best discrimination ability for differential diagnosis between the two tumors, with an AUC of 0.981 (95% CI, 0.958-1.000) and accuracy of 96.9%.
Conclusion: A combination of ADCmax and clinicoradiological features demonstrates good discrimination ability and high accuracy for differentiation between NFPMAs and sellar meningiomas, and is a potential quantitative tool to aid in the selection of surgical techniques.
Keywords: ADC; DWI; MRI; meningiomas; pituitary macroadenoma.
Figures

Similar articles
-
Quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient metrics for MRI-only suspicious breast lesions: any added clinical value?Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023 Oct 1;13(10):7092-7104. doi: 10.21037/qims-23-331. Epub 2023 Sep 12. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023. PMID: 37869329 Free PMC article.
-
Differentiating atypical meningioma from anaplastic meningioma using diffusion weighted imaging.Clin Imaging. 2022 Feb;82:237-243. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2021.12.004. Epub 2021 Dec 11. Clin Imaging. 2022. PMID: 34915318
-
The value of the apparent diffusion coefficient in differentiating type II from type I endometrial carcinoma.Acta Radiol. 2021 Jul;62(7):959-965. doi: 10.1177/0284185120944913. Epub 2020 Jul 29. Acta Radiol. 2021. PMID: 32727213
-
Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Meningioma: Prediction of Tumor Grade and Association with Histopathological Parameters.Transl Oncol. 2015 Dec;8(6):517-23. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2015.11.012. Transl Oncol. 2015. PMID: 26692534 Free PMC article.
-
Preoperative Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values for Differentiation between Low and High Grade Meningiomas: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Mar 4;12(3):630. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12030630. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35328183 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Imaging of pituitary tumors: an update with the 5th WHO Classifications-part 2. Neoplasms other than PitNET and tumor-mimicking lesions.Jpn J Radiol. 2023 Aug;41(8):808-829. doi: 10.1007/s11604-023-01407-0. Epub 2023 Mar 13. Jpn J Radiol. 2023. PMID: 36913010 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Imaging of pituitary tumors: an update with the 5th WHO Classifications-part 1. Pituitary neuroendocrine tumor (PitNET)/pituitary adenoma.Jpn J Radiol. 2023 Aug;41(8):789-806. doi: 10.1007/s11604-023-01400-7. Epub 2023 Feb 24. Jpn J Radiol. 2023. PMID: 36826759 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Imber BS, Lin AL, Zhang Z, Keshavamurthy KN, Deipolyi AR, Beal K, Cohen MA, Tabar V, DeAngelis LM, Geer EB.et al Comparison of radiographic approaches to assess treatment response in pituitary adenomas: is RECIST or RANO good enough? Journal of the Endocrine Society 2019. 3 1693–1706. (10.1210/js.2019-00130) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources