Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Nov;9(11):1095-1102.
doi: 10.1530/EC-20-0347.

IGF1 for the diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency in children and adolescents: a reappraisal

Affiliations

IGF1 for the diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency in children and adolescents: a reappraisal

Anastasia Ibba et al. Endocr Connect. 2020 Nov.

Abstract

A number of studies have evaluated the role of IGF1 measurement in the diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency (GHD). This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and the best cut-off of IGF1 SDS in the diagnosis of GHD in a large cohort of short children and adolescents. One-hundred and forty-two children and adolescents with GHD ((63 organic/genetic (OGHD), 79 idiopathic (IGHD)) and 658 short non-GHD children (median age 10.4 years) were included in the analysis. The two groups were subdivided according to age (G1 <6, G2 6 <9, G3 9 <12, G4 ≥12) and to pubertal status. Serum IGFI was measured by the same chemiluminescence assay in all samples and expressed as age- and sex-based SDS. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to evaluate the optimal IGF1 SDS cut-off and the diagnostic accuracy. Median IGF1 SDS was significantly lower in the GHD than in non-GHD patients. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.69, with the best IGF1 cut-off of -1.5 SDS (sensitivity 67.61%, specificity 62.62%). The AUC was 0.75 for OGHD and 0.63 for IGHD. The accuracy was better in the pubertal (AUC = 0.81) than the prepubertal group (AUC = 0.64). In our cohort, IGF1 measurement has poor accuracy in discriminating GHD from non-GHD. Our findings confirm and reinforce the belief that IGF1 values should not be used alone in the diagnosis of GHD but should be interpreted in combination with other clinical and biochemical parameters.

Keywords: adolescents; children; growth hormone deficiency; insulin-like growth factor 1; short stature.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
ROC curve for IGF1 SDS.
Figure 2
Figure 2
ROC curves for IGF1 SDS according to age.
Figure 3
Figure 3
ROC curves for IGF1 SDS according to pubertal status.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Collett-Solberg PF, Ambler G, Backeljauw PF, Bidlingmaier M, Biller BMK, Boguszewski MCS, Cheung PT, Choong CSY, Cohen LE, Cohen P.et al Diagnosis, genetics, and therapy of short stature in children: a Growth Hormone Research Society International Perspective. Hormone Research in Paediatrics 2019. 92 1–14. (10.1159/000502231) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cohen P, Rogol AD, Deal CL, Saenger P, Reiter EO, Ross JL, Chernausek SD, Savage MO, Wit JM.2007 ISS Consensus Workshop participants. Consensus statement on the diagnosis and treatment of children with idiopathic short stature: a summary of the Growth Hormone Research Society, the Lawson Wilkins Pediatric Endocrine Society, and the European Society for Paediatric Endocrinology Workshop. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 2008. 93 4210–4217. (10.1210/jc.2008-0509) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Murray PG, Dattani MT, Clayton PE.Controversies in the diagnosis and management of growth hormone deficiency in childhood and adolescence. Archives of Disease in Childhood 2016. 101 96–100. (10.1136/archdischild-2014-307228) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Clemmons DR.Consensus statement on the standardization and evaluation of growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor assays. Clinical Chemistry 2011. 57 555–559. (10.1373/clinchem.2010.150631) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schilbach K, Bidlingmaier M.Laboratory investigations in the diagnosis and follow-up of GH-related disorders. Archives of Endocrinology and Metabolism 2019. 63 618–629. (10.20945/2359-3997000000192) - DOI - PMC - PubMed