Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Oct 28:26:e927104.
doi: 10.12659/MSM.927104.

Need for Greater Attention to Joint Damage in Rhupus Patients: Results from an Ultrasound Study

Affiliations

Need for Greater Attention to Joint Damage in Rhupus Patients: Results from an Ultrasound Study

Zhi-Xin Chen et al. Med Sci Monit. .

Abstract

BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of inflammation and bone destruction of hand joints in rhupus patients through ultrasound examination. MATERIAL AND METHODS Ten rhupus patients and 33 systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients with hand arthropathy were recruited in this single-center study, and the clinical features and ultrasound manifestations of these patients were analyzed. RESULTS We discovered that rhupus patients were older (47.31±4.35 years vs. 38.58±2.50 years, P=0.040), had longer duration of disease (median 72 months vs. median 12 months, P=0.040), had a higher positive rate (70% vs. 10.71%, P<0.001), and had higher titers of anti-CCP antibody (42.633±14.520 vs. 2.121±0.970, P<0.001) than SLE patients with arthropathy. More importantly, the prevalence rates of synovial hyperplasia (90% vs. 42.42%, P=0.008), synovitis (90% vs. 18.18%, P<0.001), synovial hyperplasia (70% vs. 10.71%, P<0.001), and bone destruction (70% vs. 6.06%, P<0.001) were higher in rhupus patients than in SLE patients with arthropathy. CONCLUSIONS Rhupus patients are more prone to develop synovitis, synovial hyperplasia, and bone destruction. Therefore, more attention should be paid to protection of the joints in rhupus patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interests

None.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Enrollment of rhupus patients.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Enrollment of SLE patients with arthropathy.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Proportion of patients in the 2 groups who received steroids, MTX, HCQ, LEF, THH, bDMARDS, MMF, CsA, and CTX.
Figure 4
Figure 4
The number of affected hand joints in the 2 groups assessed by ultrasound testing, showing that rhupus patients had more affected joints (including PIP, MCP, and wrist) than SLE patients. (A) Synovial hyperplasia. (B) Synovitis. (C) Bone erosion.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Pipili C, Sfritzeri A, Cholongitas E. Deforming arthropathy in systemic lupus erythematosus. Eur J Intern Med. 2008;19(7):482–87. - PubMed
    1. Schur PH. Systemic lupus erythematosus. In: Beeson PB, McDermott W, editors. Cecil-Loeb Textbook of Medicine. Sanders; Philadelphia: 1971. p. 821.
    1. Li J, Wu H, Huang X, et al. Clinical analysis of 56 patients with rhupus syndrome: Manifestations and comparisons with systemic lupus erythematosus: A retrospective case-control study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2014;93(10):e49. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tani C, D’Aniello D, Delle Sedie A, et al. Rhupus syndrome: Assessment of its prevalence and its clinical and instrumental characteristics in a prospective cohort of 103 SLE patients. Autoimmun Rev. 2013;12(4):537–41. - PubMed
    1. Cohen MG, Webb J. Concurrence of rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus: Report of 11 cases. Ann Rheum Dis. 1987;46(11):853–58. - PMC - PubMed

Supplementary concepts