Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2020 Oct 28;15(10):e0241297.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241297. eCollection 2020.

Comparing static and dynamic emotion recognition tests: Performance of healthy participants

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparing static and dynamic emotion recognition tests: Performance of healthy participants

Sara Khosdelazad et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Facial expressions have a communicatory function and the ability to read them is a prerequisite for understanding feelings and thoughts of other individuals. Impairments in recognition of facial emotional expressions are frequently found in patients with neurological conditions (e.g. stroke, traumatic brain injury, frontotemporal dementia). Hence, a standard neuropsychological assessment should include measurement of emotion recognition. However, there is debate regarding which tests are most suitable. The current study evaluates and compares three different emotion recognition tests. 84 healthy participants were included and assessed with three tests, in varying order: a. Ekman 60 Faces Test (FEEST) b. Emotion Recognition Task (ERT) c. Emotion Evaluation Test (EET). The tests differ in type of stimuli from static photographs (FEEST) to more dynamic stimuli in the form of morphed photographs (ERT) to videos (EET). Comparing performances on the three tests, the lowest total scores (67.3% correct answers) were found for the ERT. Significant, but moderate correlations were found between the total scores of the three tests, but nearly all correlations between the same emotions across different tests were not significant. Furthermore, we found cross-over effects of the FEEST and EET to the ERT; participants attained higher total scores on the ERT when another emotion recognition test had been administered beforehand. Moreover, the ERT proved to be sensitive to the effects of age and education. The present findings indicate that despite some overlap, each emotion recognition test measures a unique part of the construct. The ERT seemed to be the most difficult test: performances were lowest and influenced by differences in age and education and it was the only test that showed a learning effect after practice with other tests. This highlights the importance of appropriate norms.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Comparison of the three versions regarding the total emotion recognition scores per test.
FEEST = Facial Expressions of Emotion Stimuli and Tests; ERT = Emotion Recognition Task; EET = Emotion Evaluation Test.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adolphs R. The neurobiology of social cognition. Vol. 11, Current Opinion in Neurobiology. 2001. p. 231–9. 10.1016/s0959-4388(00)00202-6 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Blair RJR. Facial expressions, their communicatory functions and neuro-cognitive substrates. Vol. 358, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2003. p. 561–72. 10.1098/rstb.2002.1220 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rigon A, Turkstra LS, Mutlu B, Duff MC. Facial-affect recognition deficit as a predictor of different aspects of social-communication impairment in traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychol. 2018;32(4):476 10.1037/neu0000368 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shimokawa A, Yatomi N, Anamizu S, Torii S, Isono H, Sugai Y, et al. Influence of deteriorating ability of emotional comprehension on interpersonal behavior in Alzheimer-type dementia. Brain Cogn. 2001;47(3):423–33. 10.1006/brcg.2001.1318 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Babbage DR, Yim J, Zupan B, Neumann D, Tomita MR, Willer B. Meta-Analysis of Facial Affect Recognition Difficulties After Traumatic Brain Injury. Neuropsychol. 2011;25(3):277–85. 10.1037/a0021908 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types