Dog cognitive development: a longitudinal study across the first 2 years of life
- PMID: 33113034
- PMCID: PMC8035344
- DOI: 10.1007/s10071-020-01443-7
Dog cognitive development: a longitudinal study across the first 2 years of life
Abstract
While our understanding of adult dog cognition has grown considerably over the past 20 years, relatively little is known about the ontogeny of dog cognition. To assess the development and longitudinal stability of cognitive traits in dogs, we administered a battery of tasks to 160 candidate assistance dogs at 2 timepoints. The tasks were designed to measure diverse aspects of cognition, ranging from executive function (e.g., inhibitory control, reversal learning, memory) to sensory discrimination (e.g., vision, audition, olfaction) to social interaction with humans. Subjects first participated as 8-10-week-old puppies, and then were retested on the same tasks at ~ 21 months of age. With few exceptions, task performance improved with age, with the largest effects observed for measures of executive function and social gaze. Results also indicated that individual differences were both early emerging and enduring; for example, social attention to humans, use of human communicative signals, independent persistence at a problem, odor discrimination, and inhibitory control all exhibited moderate levels of rank-order stability between the two timepoints. Using multiple regression, we found that young adult performance on many cognitive tasks could be predicted from a set of cognitive measures collected in early development. Our findings contribute to knowledge about changes in dog cognition across early development as well as the origins and developmental stability of individual differences.
Keywords: Assistance dog; Behavior; Cognition; Development; Individual differences; Longitudinal.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Declarations
Ethics approval: All testing procedures were reviewed and adhered to regulations set forth by the University of Arizona Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC # 16–175) and were collected in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.
Data availability: The datasets generated during and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Figures
References
-
- Agnetta B, Hare B, & Tomasello M (2000). Cues to food location that domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) of different ages do and do not use. Anim Cogn, 3(2), 107–112. doi:10.1007/s100710000070 - DOI
-
- Annett M (1994). Handedness as a continuous variable with dextral shift: sex, generation, and family handedness in subgroups of left-and right-handers. Behavior genetics, 24(1), 51–63. - PubMed
-
- Arden R, Bensky MK, & Adams MJ (2016). A Review of Cognitive Abilities in Dogs, 1911 Through 2016 More Individual Differences, Please! Curr Dir Psychol Sci, 25(5), 307–312. doi:10.1177/0963721416667718 - DOI
-
- Batt LS, Batt M, Baguley J, & McGreevy P (2008). Stability of motor lateralisation in maturing dogs. Laterality, 13(5), 468. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous
