Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May;26(2):615-636.
doi: 10.1007/s10459-020-10004-z. Epub 2020 Oct 28.

Interprofessional and multiprofessional approaches in quality improvement education

Affiliations

Interprofessional and multiprofessional approaches in quality improvement education

Joanne Goldman et al. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2021 May.

Abstract

The imperative for all healthcare professionals to partake in quality improvement (QI) has resulted in the development of QI education programs with participants from different professional backgrounds. However, there is limited empirical and theoretical examination as to why, when and how interprofessional and multiprofessional education occurs in QI and the outcomes of these approaches. This paper reports on a qualitative collective case study of interprofessional and multiprofessional education in three longitudinal QI education programs. We conducted 58 interviews with learners, QI project coaches, program directors and institutional leads and 135 h of observations of in-class education sessions, and collected relevant documents such as course syllabi and handouts. We used an interpretive thematic analysis using a conventional and directed content analysis approach. In the directed content approach, we used sociology of professions theory with particular attention to professional socialization, hierarchies and boundaries in QI, to understand the ways in which individuals' professional backgrounds informed the planning and experiences of the QI education programs. Findings demonstrated that both interprofessional and multiprofessional education approaches were being used to achieve different education objectives. While each approach demonstrated positive learning and practice outcomes, tensions related to the different ways in which professional groups are engaging in QI, power dynamics between professional groups, and disconnects between curricula and practice existed. Further conceptual clarity is essential for a more informed discussion about interprofessional and multiprofessional education approaches in QI and explicit attention is needed to professional processes and tensions, to optimize the impact of education on practice.

Keywords: Interprofessional education; Medical sociology; Multiprofessional education; Patient safety; Qualitative research; Quality improvement.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Abbott, A. D. (1988). The system of professions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    1. Allen, D. (2014). Lost in translation? ‘Evidence’ and the articulation of institutional logics in integrated care pathways: From positive to negative boundary object? Sociology of Health and Illness, 36(6), 807–822.
    1. Allen, D. (2015). Inside ‘bed management’: Ethnographic insights from the vantage point of UK hospital nurses. Sociology of Health and Illness, 37(3), 370–384.
    1. Allen, D., Braithwaite, J., Sandall, J., & Waring, J. (2016). Towards a sociology of healthcare safety and quality. Sociology of Health and Illness, 38(2), 181–197.
    1. American Association of Medical Colleges. (2019). Quality improvement and patient safety competencies. Retrieved June 2, 2020 from https://www.aamc.org/what-we-do/mission-areas/medical-education/cbme/qips .

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources