Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Oct 23;8(11):1639.
doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8111639.

Mechanisms Affecting the Acquisition, Persistence and Transmission of Francisella tularensis in Ticks

Affiliations
Review

Mechanisms Affecting the Acquisition, Persistence and Transmission of Francisella tularensis in Ticks

Brenden G Tully et al. Microorganisms. .

Abstract

Over 600,000 vector-borne disease cases were reported in the United States (U.S.) in the past 13 years, of which more than three-quarters were tick-borne diseases. Although Lyme disease accounts for the majority of tick-borne disease cases in the U.S., tularemia cases have been increasing over the past decade, with >220 cases reported yearly. However, when comparing Borrelia burgdorferi (causative agent of Lyme disease) and Francisella tularensis (causative agent of tularemia), the low infectious dose (<10 bacteria), high morbidity and mortality rates, and potential transmission of tularemia by multiple tick vectors have raised national concerns about future tularemia outbreaks. Despite these concerns, little is known about how F. tularensis is acquired by, persists in, or is transmitted by ticks. Moreover, the role of one or more tick vectors in transmitting F. tularensis to humans remains a major question. Finally, virtually no studies have examined how F. tularensis adapts to life in the tick (vs. the mammalian host), how tick endosymbionts affect F. tularensis infections, or whether other factors (e.g., tick immunity) impact the ability of F. tularensis to infect ticks. This review will assess our current understanding of each of these issues and will offer a framework for future studies, which could help us better understand tularemia and other tick-borne diseases.

Keywords: Francisella tularensis; tick-borne disease; tularemia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Possible factors affecting F. tularensis infection, persistence, and transmission in ticks. Ticks acquire F. tularensis (Ft) by taking a blood meal from an infected host (e.g., mouse, cat, squirrel, vole, rabbit, or opossum). Upon infecting ticks, F. tularensis likely regulates gene expression based on changes in temperature (37 to 27 °C) and iron (low to high). Following processing of the blood meal, nutrients are likely limited in the tick. However, during the tick molting process, chitin fragments may be made available via chitin remodeling and/or breakdown of the peritrophic matrix. Subsequently, F. tularensis must overwinter in ticks, a process which may require biofilm formation, evasion/modulation of the tick immune system, and/or interactions with tick endosymbionts. However, previous studies have not examined any of these factors. Upon transmission from infected ticks to a new mammalian host, F. tularensis likely senses mammalian cues (e.g., increased temperature, low iron, higher concentrations of amino acids) and may alter its gene expression, including virulence genes, to promote infection. Figure created using Biorender.com.

References

    1. Rosenberg R., Lindsey N.P., Fischer M., Gregory C.J., Hinckley A.F., Mead P.S., Paz-Bailey G., Waterman S.H., Drexler N.A., Kersh G.J., et al. Vital Signs: Trends in Reported Vectorborne Disease Cases United States and Territories, 2004–2016. Mmwr Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2018;67:496–501. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6717e1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ostfeld R.S., Canham C.D., Oggenfuss K., Winchcombe R.J., Keesing F. Climate, deer, rodents, and acorns as determinants of variation in lyme-disease risk. PLoS Biol. 2006;4:e145. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040145. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Molaei G., Little E.A.H., Williams S.C., Stafford K.C. Bracing for the Worst-Range Expansion of the Lone Star Tick in the Northeastern United States. N. Engl. J. Med. 2019;381:2189–2192. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1911661. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sonenshine D.E. Range Expansion of Tick Disease Vectors in North America: Implications for Spread of Tick-Borne Disease. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2018;15:478. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15030478. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Reif K.E., Ujczo J.K., Alperin D.C., Noh S.M. Francisella tularensis novicida infection competence differs in cell lines derived from United States populations of Dermacentor andersoni and Ixodes scapularis. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:12685. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-30419-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources