Healthcare utilisation and costs for temporomandibular disorders: a descriptive, cross-sectional study
- PMID: 33115889
- PMCID: PMC7594355
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-036768
Healthcare utilisation and costs for temporomandibular disorders: a descriptive, cross-sectional study
Abstract
Objective: Temporomandibular joint disorder (TMD) requires long-term management and can be a financial burden for patients. Here, we investigated the treatment received by people diagnosed with TMD and its relevant costs.
Design: A descriptive, cross-sectional study.
Setting and participants: We performed secondary data analysis of health insurance claims data provided by the Health Insurance Assessment and Review (HIRA) of the Republic of Korea. We reviewed the records of 10 041 patients who were diagnosed with TMD and who utilised outpatient healthcare service at least once between January and December 2017.
Primary and secondary outcome measures: Data on use of medical services, hospitalisations, sociodemographic factors, treatment and medication were retrieved and analysed. Cost was defined as the cost of care incurred by a health insurance beneficiary at a care facility.
Results: We reported the characteristics as medians, frequencies and percentages and found that most TMD patients were outpatients, women (58.9%) and in their 20s (46.4%). For visit type, 85.9% of all patients had an outpatient dental medical visit, with most visiting dental clinics and dental hospitals. Western medicine (WM; 9.8%) was prescribed more often, followed by Korean medicine (KM; 8.2%). The median expense per patient was highest among those in their 20s (58.00, 23.90, 53.40, 65.90 US$ for overall, WM, dental medicine (DM) and KM, respectively). Consultation fees accounted for the greatest percentage (42.8%) of DM and WM care expenses, while injection/non-surgical intervention fees accounted for the greatest percentage of KM care expenses. The most commonly used treatments for TMD were temporomandibular joint stimulation therapy (51.1%) and acupuncture (19.9%), considered as the most basic care for TMD. Psychosomatic agents (86.4%) were the most commonly used medications in outpatients.
Conclusions: While people with TMD most commonly received temporomandibular stimulation therapy, the costs and duration of treatment varied significantly for these patients.
Keywords: clinical audit; complementary medicine; epidemiology.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Figures
References
-
- Kwon YD, Lim YE, Song YS. Relationship between temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disorder and meridian. J Oriental Rehab Med 2000;10:1.
-
- Korean Society of Chuna manual Medicine for Spine & Nerves Chuna manual medicine. Seoul: Korean Society of Chuna manual Medicine for Spine & Nerves, 2011: 447–8.
-
- Fricton JR, Kroening RJ, Hathaway KM. TMJ and craniofacial pain: diagnosis and management. Ishiyaku EuroAmerica 1988.
-
- de Godoi Gonçalves DA, Dal Fabbro AL, Campos JA, et al. Symptoms of temporomandibular disorders in the population: an epidemiological study. J Orofac Pain 2010;24. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical