Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec;80(6):1168-1195.
doi: 10.1177/0013164420914711. Epub 2020 Apr 24.

A Mixture IRTree Model for Performance Decline and Nonignorable Missing Data

Affiliations

A Mixture IRTree Model for Performance Decline and Nonignorable Missing Data

Hung-Yu Huang. Educ Psychol Meas. 2020 Dec.

Abstract

In educational assessments and achievement tests, test developers and administrators commonly assume that test-takers attempt all test items with full effort and leave no blank responses with unplanned missing values. However, aberrant response behavior-such as performance decline, dropping out beyond a certain point, and skipping certain items over the course of the test-is inevitable, especially for low-stakes assessments and speeded tests due to low motivation and time limits, respectively. In this study, test-takers are classified as normal or aberrant using a mixture item response theory (IRT) modeling approach, and aberrant response behavior is described and modeled using item response trees (IRTrees). Simulations are conducted to evaluate the efficiency and quality of the new class of mixture IRTree model using WinBUGS with Bayesian estimation. The results show that the parameter recovery is satisfactory for the proposed mixture IRTree model and that treating missing values as ignorable or incorrect and ignoring possible performance decline results in biased estimation. Finally, the applicability of the new model is illustrated by means of an empirical example based on the Program for International Student Assessment.

Keywords: IRTree; item response theory (IRT); missing not at random; mixture models; performance decline.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Graphical representation of the mixture IRTree-based model for performance decline and nonignorable missing data. Note. The circles and squares represent the internal nodes and observed responses, respectively. IRTree = item response tree.

References

    1. Ashcraft M. H., Krause J. A. (2007). Working memory, math performance, and math anxiety. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(2), 243-248. 10.3758/BF03194059 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bliss L. B. (1980). A test of Lord’s assumption regarding examinee guessing behavior on multiple choice tests using elementary school children. Journal of Educational Measurement, 17(2), 147-153. 10.1111/j.1745-3984.1980.tb00823.x - DOI
    1. Boekaerts M. (1997). Self-regulated learning: A new concept embraced by researchers, policy makers, educators, teachers, and students. Learning and Instruction, 7(2), 161-186. 10.1016/S0959-4752(96)00015-1 - DOI
    1. Bolt D. M., Cohen A. S., Wollack J. A. (2002). Item parameter estimation under conditions of test speededness: Applications of a mixture Rasch model with ordinal constraints. Journal of Educational Measurement, 39(4), 331-348. 10.1111/j.1745-3984.2002.tb01146.x - DOI
    1. Brooks S. P., Gelman A. (1998). General methods for monitoring convergence of iterative simulations. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 7(4), 434-455. 10.1080/10618600.1998.10474787 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources