Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jul 1;30(3):180-185.
doi: 10.5737/23688076303180185. eCollection 2020 Summer.

Engaging patients as partners in cancer care: An innovative strategy to implement screening for distress?

Affiliations

Engaging patients as partners in cancer care: An innovative strategy to implement screening for distress?

Jacynthe Rivest et al. Can Oncol Nurs J. .

Abstract

Patient distress is frequently missed in everyday cancer care, yet can be associated with decreased quality of life and satisfaction with care, as well as increased risk for comorbidity and morbidity. Considered as an aspect of a patient-centred approach, screening for distress is now an international standard of practice and constitutes an accreditation criterion for cancer centers in the USA and Canada. Inspired by existing health partnership models, the Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal's (CHUM) Integrative Cancer Care Center recruited patients to act as partners during the creation and implementation of its screening for distress program. Patient partner roles in the program included becoming a member of a specialized psychosocial oncology team, contributing to a healthcare professional training program and helping to select tools to detect distress. This paper describes why and how the CHUM cancer care centre developed an innovative screening for distress program, using a patient partnership approach, to better meet the needs of patients with cancer.

Keywords: cancer care; distress screening; mental health; oncology; patient navigator; patient partnership.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The six components of the Distress Detection Program of the Integrated Oncology Center of the Centre Hospitalier de I'Universite de Montréal

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bernardo BM, Zhang X, Beverly Hery CM, Meadows RJ, Paskett ED. The efficacy and cost-effectiveness of patient navigation programs across the cancer continuum: A systematic review. Cancer. 2019;125(16):2747–2761. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32147. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Blais M-C, St-Hilaire A, Fillion L, De Serres M, Tremblay A. What to do with screening for distress scores? Integrating descriptive data into clinical practice. Palliative and Supportive Care. 2014;12(1):25–38. doi: 10.1017/S1478951513000059. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bombard Y, Baker GR, Orlando E, Fancott C, Bhatia P, Casalino S, Pomey MP. Engaging patients to improve quality of care: A systematic review. Implementation Science : IS. 2018;13(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0784-z. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bultz BD, Carlson LE. Emotional distress: the sixth vital sign – future directions in cancer care. Psycho-Oncology. 2006;15(2):93–95. doi: 10.1002/pon.1022. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bultz BD, Groff SL, Fitch M. Implementing screening for distress, the 6th vital sign: A Canadian strategy for changing practice. Psycho-oncology. 2011;20:463–9. doi: 10.1002/PON.1932. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources