Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Oct 6:11:575577.
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.575577. eCollection 2020.

The Role of T Cells Reactive to the Cathelicidin Antimicrobial Peptide LL-37 in Acute Coronary Syndrome and Plaque Calcification

Affiliations

The Role of T Cells Reactive to the Cathelicidin Antimicrobial Peptide LL-37 in Acute Coronary Syndrome and Plaque Calcification

Fernando Chernomordik et al. Front Immunol. .

Abstract

The human cationic anti-microbial peptide LL-37 is a T cell self-antigen in patients with psoriasis, who have increased risk of cardiovascular events. However, the role of LL-37 as a T cell self-antigen in the context of atherosclerosis remains unclear. The objective of this study was to test for the presence of T cells reactive to LL-37 in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Furthermore, the role of T cells reactive to LL-37 in atherosclerosis was assessed using apoE-/- mice immunized with the LL-37 mouse ortholog, mCRAMP. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from patients with ACS were stimulated with LL-37. PBMCs from stable coronary artery disease (CAD) patients or self-reported subjects served as controls. T cell memory responses were analyzed with flow cytometry. Stimulation of PBMCs with LL-37 reduced CD8+ effector T cell responses in controls and patients with stable CAD but not in ACS and was associated with reduced programmed cell death protein 1 (PDCD1) mRNA expression. For the mouse studies, donor apoE-/- mice were immunized with mCRAMP or adjuvant as controls, then T cells were isolated and adoptively transferred into recipient apoE-/- mice fed a Western diet. Recipient mice were euthanized after 5 weeks. Whole aortas and hearts were collected for analysis of atherosclerotic plaques. Spleens were collected for flow cytometric and mRNA expression analysis. Adoptive transfer experiments in apoE-/- mice showed a 28% reduction in aortic plaque area in mCRAMP T cell recipient mice (P < 0.05). Fifty six percent of adjuvant T cell recipient mice showed calcification in atherosclerotic plaques, compared to none in the mCRAMP T cell recipient mice (Fisher's exact test P = 0.003). Recipients of T cells from mice immunized with mCRAMP had increased IL-10 and IFN-γ expression in CD8+ T cells compared to controls. In conclusion, the persistence of CD8+ effector T cell response in PBMCs from patients with ACS stimulated with LL-37 suggests that LL-37-reactive T cells may be involved in the acute event. Furthermore, studies in apoE-/- mice suggest that T cells reactive to mCRAMP are functionally active in atherosclerosis and may be involved in modulating plaque calcification.

Keywords: LL-37; T cells; acute coronary syndrome; atherosclerosis; cathelicidin; mCRAMP.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Enzymatic processing of the human antimicrobial peptide LL-37 and the mouse ortholog mCRAMP.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
PBMC T Effector cell response to stimulation with the human antimicrobial peptide LL-37. CD8+ (A–C) and CD4+ (D–F) Memory T cell responses to stimulation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells from self-reported controls (Control), stable coronary artery disease (Stable), and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients. T Effector Memory (B,E) and T Effector Memory RA+ (C,F) were based on CD45RO/CD45RA flow cytometric stain as detailed in the gating scheme described in Supplementary Figure 1. Control N = 15; Stable N = 10; ACS N = 10. *P < 0.05 ACS vs Control or Stable CAD (A–C) and Stable vs ACS (D); P = 0.053 Control vs Stable; P = 0.055 Stable vs ACS. Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn’s multiple comparisons test.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
PBMC T Effector cell response to stimulation with the cathelin domain of the human proprotein hCAP-18, cat-hCAP-18. CD8+ (A–C) and CD4+ (D–F) Memory T cell responses to stimulation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells from self-reported controls (Control), stable coronary artery disease (Stable), and acute coronary syndrome patients (ACS). T Effector Memory (B,E) and T Effector Memory RA+ (C,F) were based on CD45RO/CD45RA flow cytometric stain as detailed in the gating scheme described in Supplementary Figure 1. Control N = 15; Stable CAD N = 10; ACS N = 9; *P < 0.05 Stable vs ACS. Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn’s multiple comparisons test.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Immune checkpoint PDCD1 mRNA expression and correlation in T Effector response to LL-37 and cat-hCAP-18. Programmed cell death protein 1 (PDCD1) mRNA expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells stimulated with the human antimicrobial peptide LL-37 (A) or the cathelin domain of the proprotein hCAP-18, cat-hCAP-18 (B). Control N = 6; Stable = 5; ACS = 5. *P < 0.05 (ACS vs Control; Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn’s multiple comparisons test). Correlation plot between CD8+ T Effector response to LL-37 and cat-hCAP-18 (C). Correlation plot between CD4+ T Effector response to LL-37 and cat-hCAP-18 (D).
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Memory T cell response of splenocytes to immunization of apoE–/– mice with the murine antimicrobial peptide mCRAMP. CD8+ Effector Memory (EM) T cells (A), Central Memory (CM) T cells (B), CD8+FoxP3+ T cells (C) and CD8+CD107a+ T cells (D) in mice immunized with mCRAMP compared to adjuvant. N = 5 each. CD4+EM T cells (E), CD4+ CM T cells (F), and CD4+FoxP3+ T cells (G) in mice immunized with mCRAMP compared to Adjuvant. N = 5 each; *P < 0.05, t-test. Gating scheme for memory T cells and FoxP3+ T cells shown in Supplementary Figure 6. Gating scheme for CD8+CD107a+ T cells shown in Supplementary Figure 7.
FIGURE 6
FIGURE 6
Aortic atherosclerosis plaque burden in T cell recipient apoE–/– mice. Representative photographs of en face aortas stained with Oil red O (A) from T cell recipients of adjuvant and mCRAMP immunized mice. Bar = 0.5 cm. Atherosclerotic burden was assessed by measuring Oil Red O stained plaque area (B). Adjuvant N = 9; mCRAMP N = 15; *P < 0.05, t-test.
FIGURE 7
FIGURE 7
Aortic sinus plaque composition in T cell recipient apoE–/– mice. Representative photos of Oil Red O stain for lipids (A). Aortic sinus plaque size (B; Adjuvant N = 9, mCRAMP N = 12) and lipid area (C; Oil Red O staining; Adjuvant N = 9; mCRAMP N = 12). Representative photos of CD68 stain for macrophage (D) and macrophage area (E; N = 6 each). Representative photos of Masson’s trichrome stain (F) and collagen stain area (G; Adjuvant N = 9; mCRAMP N = 15). Bar = 0.1 mm.
FIGURE 8
FIGURE 8
Analysis of key immune regulatory pathways in T cell recipient mice. Splenic mRNA expression of IL-1β (A), Pdcd1 (B) or Ctla4 (C) between mCRAMP or adjuvant T cell recipient mice. N = 5 each.
FIGURE 9
FIGURE 9
Atherosclerotic plaque calcification in T cell recipient mice. Representative photographs of aortic sinuses stained with the calcium specific Alizarin Red S in adjuvant (A, inset 20× magnification) or mCRAMP (B) T cell recipient mice. Bar = 0.1 mm. Intracellular staining for splenic CD8+INF-γ+ T cells (C) and CD8+IL-10+ T cells (D). Intracellular staining for splenic CD4+INF-γ+ T cells (E) and CD4+IL-10+ T cells (F). Adjuvant N = 8; mCRAMP N = 14. *P < 0.05, Mann-Whitney test. Gating scheme for T cell intracellular staining shown in Supplementary Figure 8.
FIGURE 10
FIGURE 10
Pathways of tissue calcification potentially mediated by T cells. (A) Splenic Wnt10b mRNA expression in mCRAMP compared to adjuvant T cell recipient mice at 23 weeks of age (A; N = 7 each group). Splenic Runx2 mRNA (B; N = 5 each group), RANKL mRNA (C), and osteocalcin (OCN) mRNA (D) expression in mCRAMP T cell recipient mice compared to adjuvant T cell recipients (N = 5–7 each). Serum RANKL (E; Adjuvant N = 9; mCRAMP N = 14) and serum undercarboxylated osteocalcin (unOCN) levels (F; Adjuvant N = 9; mCRAMP N = 14). *P < 0.05; (A,C), t-test; (D), Mann-Whitney test.

References

    1. Hansson GK, Libby P, Schönbeck U, Yan Z-Q. Innate and adaptive immunity in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Circ Res. (2002) 91:281–91. 10.1161/01.res.0000029784.15893.10 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Milioti N, Bermudez-Fajardo A, Penichet ML, Oviedo-Orta E. Antigen-Induced Immunomodulation in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Clin Dev Immunol. (2008) 2008:1–15. 10.1155/2008/723539 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Saigusa R, Winkels H, Ley K. T cell subsets and functions in atherosclerosis. Nat Rev Cardiol. (2020) 17:387–401. 10.1038/s41569-020-0352-5 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nilsson J, Hansson GK. Autoimmunity in atherosclerosis: a protective response losing control? J Intern Med. (2008) 263:464–78. 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2008.01945.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ammirati E, Cianflone D, Vecchio V, Banfi M, Vermi AC, De Metrio M, et al. Effector memory T cells are associated with atherosclerosis in humans and animal models. J Am Heart Assoc. (2012) 1:27–41. 10.1161/xjaha.111.000125 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms