Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan 19;12(1):e0008.
doi: 10.5041/RMMJ.10423.

Post-Mortem Pedagogy: A Brief History of the Practice of Anatomical Dissection

Affiliations

Post-Mortem Pedagogy: A Brief History of the Practice of Anatomical Dissection

Connor T A Brenna. Rambam Maimonides Med J. .

Abstract

Anatomical dissection is almost ubiquitous in modern medical education, masking a complex history of its practice. Dissection with the express purpose of understanding human anatomy began more than two millennia ago with Herophilus, but was soon after disavowed in the third century BCE. Historical evidence suggests that this position was based on common beliefs that the body must remain whole after death in order to access the afterlife. Anatomical dissection did not resume for almost 1500 years, and in the interim anatomical knowledge was dominated by (often flawed) reports generated through the comparative dissection of animals. When a growing recognition of the utility of anatomical knowledge in clinical medicine ushered human dissection back into vogue, it recommenced in a limited setting almost exclusively allowing for dissection of the bodies of convicted criminals. Ultimately, the ethical problems that this fostered, as well as the increasing demand from medical education for greater volumes of human dissection, shaped new considerations of the body after death. Presently, body bequeathal programs are a popular way in which individuals offer their bodies to medical education after death, suggesting that the once widespread views of dissection as punishment have largely dissipated.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bay NSY, Bay BH. Greek anatomist Herophilus: the father of anatomy. Anat Cell Bio. 2010;43:280–3. doi: 10.5115/acb.2010.43.4.280. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ferngren G. Vivisection ancient and modern. Hist Med. 2017;4:211–21.
    1. Spencer WG, translator. Celsus De Medicina. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1935.
    1. Wills A. Herophilus, Erasistratus, and the birth of neuroscience. Lancet. 1999;354:1719–20. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)02081-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hackforth R, editor. Plato: Phaedo. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1972.

LinkOut - more resources