Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Oct 30;15(10):e0241606.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241606. eCollection 2020.

Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Resilience Scale (RS-14): Preliminary results

Affiliations

Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Resilience Scale (RS-14): Preliminary results

Wei Chen et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: In recent years, resilience has received extensive attention in psychology. The 14-Item Resilience Scale (RS-14) has been developed as a newer and shorter version of the resilience scale and has been applied in Western countries. In Eastern cultures, however, and particularly among Chinese populations, its factor structure remains unverified. The purpose of this study is to realize the first evaluation of the psychometric characteristics of the Chinese version of the RS-14 in young adults from Mainland China.

Methods: The resilience scale, Connor-Davidson resilience scale, general health questionnaire 12, perceived stress scale 14, general self-efficacy scale and meaning in life questionnaire were used to investigate 1010 undergraduates (321 male college students, 689 female college students, aged 17-25 years; mean age = 20.27; SD = 1.572). We evaluated the item quality, latent structure, reliability, criterion validity and differential item functioning on the gender variable.

Results: Through the analysis methods of exploratory and confirmatory factor-analytic, the original single-factor model has been proven to be applicable within the Chinese population. Both an adequate construct validity and an excellent degree of reliability were reflected in the data. In addition, test-retest evinced good stability. The current study interrogates associations with external criteria, as well as providing evidence in support of the RS-14.

Conclusion: To sum up, this study showed that the RS-14 is a reliable assessment for measuring resilience in China, and provides an alternative to the original scale.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Woods DD. Four concepts for resilience and the implications for the future of resilience engineering. Reliability Engineering & System Safety. 2015;141:5–9. 10.1016/j.ress.2015.03.018 - DOI
    1. Wagnild G, Young H. Development and psychometric evaluation of the Resilience Scale. Journal of Nursing Measurement. 1993;2(1):165–78. - PubMed
    1. Ong AD, Bergeman CS, Bisconti TL, Wallace KA. Psychological resilience, positive emotions, and successful adaptation to stress in later life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2006;91(4):730–49. 10.1037/0022-3514.91.4.730 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cohrs JC, Christie DJ, White MP, Das C. Contributions of positive psychology to peace: toward global well-being and resilience. American Psychologist. 2013;68(7):590–600. 10.1037/a0032089 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Atsushi O, Hitoshi K, Shinji N, Motoyuki N. Construct validity of the Adolescent Resilience Scale. Psychological Reports. 2003;93(2):1217–22. 10.2466/pr0.2003.93.3f.1217 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types