The Use of Visceral Proteins as Nutrition Markers: An ASPEN Position Paper
- PMID: 33125793
- DOI: 10.1002/ncp.10588
The Use of Visceral Proteins as Nutrition Markers: An ASPEN Position Paper
Erratum in
-
Corrigendum: The Use of Visceral Proteins as Nutrition Markers: An ASPEN Position Paper. Nutr Clin Pract. 2021; 36 (1):22-28.Nutr Clin Pract. 2021 Aug;36(4):909. doi: 10.1002/ncp.10746. Epub 2021 Jun 24. Nutr Clin Pract. 2021. PMID: 34165811 No abstract available.
Abstract
Serum albumin and prealbumin, well-known visceral proteins, have traditionally been considered useful biochemical laboratory values in a nutrition assessment. However, recent literature disputes this contention. The aim of this document is to clarify that these proteins characterize inflammation rather than describe nutrition status or protein-energy malnutrition. Both critical illness and chronic illness are characterized by inflammation and, as such, hepatic reprioritization of protein synthesis occurs, resulting in lower serum concentrations of albumin and prealbumin. In addition, the redistribution of serum proteins occurs because of an increase in capillary permeability. There is an association between inflammation and malnutrition, however, not between malnutrition and visceral-protein levels. These proteins correlate well with patients' risk for adverse outcomes rather than with protein-energy malnutrition. Therefore, serum albumin and prealbumin should not serve as proxy measures of total body protein or total muscle mass and should not be used as nutrition markers. This paper has been approved by the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition Board of Directors.
Keywords: adverse outcomes; albumin; critical care; inflammation; nutrition assessment; prealbumin; risk; visceral proteins.
© 2020 American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition.
Comment in
-
Response to "Low albumin levels should be interpreted, but not ignored".Nutr Clin Pract. 2021 Apr;36(2):504. doi: 10.1002/ncp.10648. Epub 2021 Feb 12. Nutr Clin Pract. 2021. PMID: 33580558 No abstract available.
References
-
- Zheng ZY, Heyland DK. Determination of nutrition risk and status in critically ill patients: what are our considerations. Nutr Clin Pract. 2019;34(1):96-111.
-
- White JV, Guenter P, Jensen GL, Malone A, Schofield M. Consensus Statement: Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics and American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition: characteristics recommended for the identification and documentation of adult malnutrition (under-nutrition). JPEN J Parent Ent Nutr. 2012;36(3):275-283.
-
- Puthucheary ZA, Rawal J, McPhail M, et al. Acute skeletal muscle wasting in critical illness. JAMA. 2013;310(15):1591-1600.
-
- Sharma K, Mogensen KM, Robinson MK. Pathophysiology of critical illness and role of nutrition. Nutr Clin Pract. 2019;34(1):12-22.
-
- Merker M, Felder M, Gueissaz L, et al. Association of baseline inflammation with effectiveness of nutritional support among patients with disease-related malnutrition a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Network Open. 2020;3(3):e200663. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.0663.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials