Can counter-advertising protect spectators of elite sport against the influence of unhealthy food and beverage sponsorship? A naturalistic trial

Helen Dixon¹, Maree Scully², Melanie Wakefield³, Bridget Kelly⁴, Simone Pettigrew⁵, Kathy Chapman⁶, Jeff Niederdeppe⁷

Affiliations

¹ Centre for Behavioural Research in Cancer, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; School of Psychology, Curtin University, Bentley, Western Australia, Australia. Electronic address: Helen.Dixon@cancervic.org.au.
² Centre for Behavioural Research in Cancer, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
³ Centre for Behavioural Research in Cancer, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
⁴ Early Start, School of Health and Society, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.
⁵ The George Institute for Global Health, Newtown, New South Wales, Australia; School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
⁶ School of Life and Environment Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia; Heart Foundation, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
⁷ Department of Communication, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.

PMID: 33126095
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113415

Can counter-advertising protect spectators of elite sport against the influence of unhealthy food and beverage sponsorship? A naturalistic trial

Helen Dixon et al. Soc Sci Med. 2020 Dec.

. 2020 Dec:266:113415.

doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113415. Epub 2020 Oct 10.

Authors

Helen Dixon¹, Maree Scully², Melanie Wakefield³, Bridget Kelly⁴, Simone Pettigrew⁵, Kathy Chapman⁶, Jeff Niederdeppe⁷

Affiliations

¹ Centre for Behavioural Research in Cancer, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; School of Psychology, Curtin University, Bentley, Western Australia, Australia. Electronic address: Helen.Dixon@cancervic.org.au.
² Centre for Behavioural Research in Cancer, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
³ Centre for Behavioural Research in Cancer, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
⁴ Early Start, School of Health and Society, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.
⁵ The George Institute for Global Health, Newtown, New South Wales, Australia; School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
⁶ School of Life and Environment Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia; Heart Foundation, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
⁷ Department of Communication, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.

PMID: 33126095
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113415

Abstract

Rationale and objective: Unhealthy, energy-dense nutrient-poor foods and beverages are heavily promoted through sport sponsorship. This naturalistic trial assessed whether exposing young adult spectators to various types of counter-advertising (CA) before watching an unhealthy food sponsored elite sporting event could diminish sponsorship effects and increase support for restrictions on sponsorship.

Method: Young adults (ages 18-29 years) who planned to watch the Australian Football League (AFL) Grand Final were recruited through an online panel and randomly assigned to one of four conditions: (A) control (neutral advertisement); (B) anti-industry CA (critiquing unhealthy food industry sponsorship of sport); (C) anti-product CA (critiquing the association of sports stars with unhealthy food); or (D) negative health effects CA (highlighting negative health consequences of unhealthy food consumption). Participants (N = 1316) completed a pre-test questionnaire and viewed their assigned CA online 1-3 days before watching the 2017 AFL Grand Final, which featured unhealthy food sponsorship.

Results: Participants who reported watching the AFL Grand Final (n = 802) answered post-test measures within five days of the event. Results indicated that participants found the anti-industry CA more believable, attention-grabbing, reassuring and encouraging than the anti-product CA. The anti-industry CA promoted less favourable attitudes to sponsor brands, the anti-product CA promoted reduced intentions to purchase the fast-food sponsor brand, and the negative health effects CA reduced preferences for fast food in general compared to the control condition.

Conclusions: Anti-industry CA may detract from favourable attitudes to unhealthy food sponsor brands and negative health effects CA may detract from intentions to consume fast food in the face of unhealthy food sponsorship exposure. Such interventions may require higher dosage levels than applied in the present study to bolster spectators' resistance to the surfeit of unhealthy food sport sponsorship.

Keywords: Australia; Counter-advertising; EDNP; Foods; Intervention; Sport sponsorship; Young adults.

PubMed Disclaimer

Cited by

Can counter-advertising dilute marketing effects of alcohol sponsorship of elite sport: A field experiment.
Dixon H, Scully M, Niederdeppe J, Brennan E, O'Brien K, Vandenberg B, Pettigrew S, Wakefield M. Dixon H, et al. Addiction. 2023 Dec;118(12):2360-2373. doi: 10.1111/add.16317. Epub 2023 Aug 10. Addiction. 2023. PMID: 37563764 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Can counter-advertising exposing alcohol sponsorship and harms influence sport spectators' support for alcohol policies? An experimental study.
Scully M, Dixon H, Brennan E, Niederdeppe J, O'Brien K, Pettigrew S, Vandenberg B, Wakefield M. Scully M, et al. BMC Public Health. 2023 Feb 27;23(1):396. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15250-5. BMC Public Health. 2023. PMID: 36849894 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Food marketing, eating and health outcomes in children and adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Boyland E, Muc M, Coates A, Ells L, Halford JCG, Hill Z, Maden M, Matu J, Maynard MJ, Rodgers J, Targett V, Tatlow-Golden M, Young M, Jones A. Boyland E, et al. Br J Nutr. 2025 Mar 28;133(6):781-805. doi: 10.1017/S0007114524000102. Epub 2025 Jun 16. Br J Nutr. 2025. PMID: 40518855 Free PMC article.

Publication types

Actions

MeSH terms

Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources
- Elsevier Science

Save citation to file

Email citation

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Your saved search

Create a file for external citation management software

Your RSS Feed

Can counter-advertising protect spectators of elite sport against the influence of unhealthy food and beverage sponsorship? A naturalistic trial

Affiliations

Can counter-advertising protect spectators of elite sport against the influence of unhealthy food and beverage sponsorship? A naturalistic trial

Authors

Affiliations

Abstract

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources