Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Oct 28;12(11):3170.
doi: 10.3390/cancers12113170.

Modelling Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Cancer: From Bench Side to Clinic

Affiliations
Review

Modelling Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Cancer: From Bench Side to Clinic

Alexander Ney et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (pNETs) are a heterogeneous group of epithelial tumours with neuroendocrine differentiation. Although rare (incidence of <1 in 100,000), they are the second most common group of pancreatic neoplasms after pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). pNET incidence is however on the rise and patient outcomes, although variable, have been linked with 5-year survival rates as low as 40%. Improvement of diagnostic and treatment modalities strongly relies on disease models that reconstruct the disease ex vivo. A key constraint in pNET research, however, is the absence of human pNET models that accurately capture the original tumour phenotype. In attempts to more closely mimic the disease in its native environment, three-dimensional culture models as well as in vivo models, such as genetically engineered mouse models (GEMMs), have been developed. Despite adding significant contributions to our understanding of more complex biological processes associated with the development and progression of pNETs, factors such as ethical considerations and low rates of clinical translatability limit their use. Furthermore, a role for the site-specific extracellular matrix (ECM) in disease development and progression has become clear. Advances in tissue engineering have enabled the use of tissue constructs that are designed to establish disease ex vivo within a close to native ECM that can recapitulate tumour-associated tissue remodelling. Yet, such advanced models for studying pNETs remain underdeveloped. This review summarises the most clinically relevant disease models of pNETs currently used, as well as future directions for improved modelling of the disease.

Keywords: disease models; genetically engineered mouse models; multicellular spheroids; organoids; pancreatic cancer; pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Generating a knockout mouse model: Generation of a knockout mouse model involves the incorporation of a predesigned target gene into embryonic stem cells (ESCs) (1–3) followed by their incorporation into a blastocyst and later into a surrogate mouse (4–5). Chimeric offspring are crossbred with wild-type mice and new-born heterozygous mice are bred again to produce homozygous offspring bearing the mutation of interest (6–9). (X*/*—Hetero/homozygosity for target gene) (Illustration created with BioRender.com.)
Figure 2
Figure 2
Multicellular spheroids (MCSs) are derived from cell lines or patient-derived xenograft (PDX) cells (A). Increased cellular expression of cadherins and their intercellular cadherin–cadherin interactions lead to spheroid compaction. Mature spheroids show a concentric organisation into multilayered structures leading to nutrient gradient formation, resulting in insufficient transport towards their core as well as elimination of waste products. Organoids (B) are derived from primary tissue stem cells and their culture gives rise to structures mimicking the original tissue architecture. (Illustration created with BioRender.com.)

References

    1. Hopper A.D., Jalal M., Munir A. Recent advances in the diagnosis and management of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. Front. Gastroenterol. 2018;10:269–274. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2018-101006. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Halfdanarson T.R., Rubin J., Farnell M.B., Grant C.S., Petersen G.M. Pancreatic endocrine neoplasms: Epidemiology and prognosis of pancreatic endocrine tumors. Endocr. Relat. Cancer. 2008;15:409–427. doi: 10.1677/ERC-07-0221. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jensen R.T., Berna M.J., Bingham D.B., Norton J.A. Inherited pancreatic endocrine tumor syndromes: Advances in molecular pathogenesis, diagnosis, management, and controversies. Cancer. 2008;113:1807–1843. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23648. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dilley W.G., Kalyanaraman S., Verma S., Cobb J.P., Laramie J.M., Lairmore T.C. Global gene expression in neuroendocrine tumors from patients with the MEN1 syndrome. Mol. Cancer. 2005;4:9. doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-4-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Falconi M., Eriksson B., Kaltsas G., Bartsch D., Capdevila J.A., Caplin M., Kos-Kudla B., Kwekkeboom D.J., Rindi G., Kloppel G., et al. ENETS Consensus Guidelines Update for the Management of Patients with Functional Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors and Non-Functional Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors. Neuroendocrinology. 2016;103:153–171. doi: 10.1159/000443171. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources