Nano-Surface Implants: Indications and Limitations
- PMID: 33128363
- PMCID: PMC8279309
- DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjaa265
Nano-Surface Implants: Indications and Limitations
Erratum in
-
Corrigendum to: Nano-Surface Implants: Indications and Limitations.Aesthet Surg J. 2021 Sep 14;41(10):NP1353. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjab256. Aesthet Surg J. 2021. PMID: 34423349 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Comment in
-
Response to: Nano-Surface Implants: Indications and Limitations.Aesthet Surg J. 2021 Jul 14;41(8):NP1143-NP1146. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjaa297. Aesthet Surg J. 2021. PMID: 33693485 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Comment on
-
Preliminary 3-Year Evaluation of Experience With SilkSurface and VelvetSurface Motiva Silicone Breast Implants: A Single-Center Experience With 5813 Consecutive Breast Augmentation Cases.Aesthet Surg J. 2018 May 15;38(suppl_2):S62-S73. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjx150. Aesthet Surg J. 2018. PMID: 29040364 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Huemer GM, Wenny R, Aitzetmüller MM, Duscher D. Motiva Ergonomix round Silksurface silicone breast implants: outcome analysis of 100 primary breast augmentations over 3 years and technical considerations. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;141(6):831e-842e. - PubMed
-
- Nava MB, Rancati A, De Vita R, Catanuto G, Rocco N. Clarification about “expert consensus on the use of a new bioengineered, cell-friendly, smooth surface breast implant.” Aesthet Surg J. 2019;39(12):NP538-NP539. - PubMed