Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2021 Sep;29(9):3025-3036.
doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-06334-5. Epub 2020 Oct 31.

Autograft type affects muscle strength and hop performance after ACL reconstruction. A randomised controlled trial comparing patellar tendon and hamstring tendon autografts with standard or accelerated rehabilitation

Riccardo Cristiani  1   2 , Christina Mikkelsen  3   4 , Peter Wange  3   5 , Daniel Olsson  6 , Anders Stålman  3   4 , Björn Engström  3   4
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Autograft type affects muscle strength and hop performance after ACL reconstruction. A randomised controlled trial comparing patellar tendon and hamstring tendon autografts with standard or accelerated rehabilitation

Riccardo Cristiani et al. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021 Sep.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate and compare changes in quadriceps and hamstring strength and single-leg-hop (SLH) test performance over the first 24 postoperative months in patients who underwent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) or hamstring tendon (HT) autografts and followed either a standard or an accelerated rehabilitation protocol.

Methods: A total of 160 patients undergoing ACLR were randomised in four groups depending on the graft that was used and the rehabilitation protocol (40 BPTB/standard rehab, 40 BPTB/accelerated rehab, 40 HT/standard rehab, 40 HT/accelerated rehab). Isokinetic concentric quadriceps and hamstring strength at 90°/s and the SLH test performance were assessed preoperatively and 4,6,8,12 and 24 months postoperatively. The results were reported as the limb symmetry index (LSI) at the same time point. Linear mixed models were used to compare the groups at the different time points.

Results: An average quadriceps strength LSI of 78.4% was found preoperatively. After ACLR, the LSI first decreased at 4 months and then increased from 6 to 24 months, reaching an overall value of 92.7% at the latest follow-up. The BPTB group showed a significantly decreased LSI at 4, 6, 8 and 12 months compared with the HT group. No significant differences between the graft groups were found at 24 months. An average hamstring strength LSI of 84.6% was found preoperatively. After ACLR, the LSI increased from 4 to 24 months in the BTPB group. In the HT group, the LSI first decreased at 4 months and then increased from 6 to 24 months. An LSI of 97.1% and 89.1% was found at the latest follow-up for the BPTB and the HT group, respectively. The HT group showed a significantly decreased LSI at all follow-ups compared with the BPTB group. An average SLH test LSI of 81% was found preoperatively. After ACLR, the LSI increased from 4 to 24 months, reaching 97.6% overall at the latest follow-up. The BPTB group showed a significantly decreased LSI only at 4 months postoperatively compared with the HT group. No significant differences in any of the three tests were found between the standard and accelerated rehabilitation groups for either of the graft groups at any time point.

Conclusion: Muscle strength and SLH test performance recovered progressively after ACLR overall, but they did not all fully recover, as the injured leg performed on average less than 100% compared with the uninjured leg even 24 months postoperatively. After ACLR, inferior quadriceps strength and a poorer SLH test performance were found at 4, 6, 8 and 12 months and at 4 months, respectively, for the BTPB group compared with the HT group. Persistent, inferior hamstring strength was found at all postoperative follow-ups in the HT group. Rehabilitation, standard or accelerated, had no significant impact on the recovery of muscle strength and SLH test performance after ACLR in any of the graft groups.

Level of evidence: Level I.

Keywords: ACL; Anterior cruciate ligament; Graft; Hamstring; Hamstring strength; Hop test; Limb symmetry index; Muscle strength; Patellar tendon; Quadriceps strength.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Each author declares that no possible conflict of interest (financial or not financial) exists in connection with this study.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Participant randomisation. ACL anterior cruciate ligament, BPTB bone-patellar tendon-bone, HT hamstring tendon
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
a–c LSI (mean and 95% CI) for quadriceps strength at 90°/second from preoperative to 24 months postoperative and comparison between BPTB and HT groups (a) BPTB/standard rehabilitation and BPTB/accelerated rehabilitation (b) and HT/standard rehabilitation and HT/accelerated rehabilitation (c) groups at each time point. BPTB bone-patellar tendon-bone, CI confidence intervals, HT hamstring tendon, LSI limb symmetry index. *Only significant P values are reported
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
a–c LSI (mean and 95% CI) for hamstring strength at 90°/second from preoperative to 24 months postoperative and comparison between BPTB and HT groups (a), BPTB/standard rehabilitation and BPTB/accelerated rehabilitation (b) and HT/standard rehabilitation and HT/accelerated rehabilitation (c) groups at each time point. BPTB bone-patellar tendon-bone, CI confidence intervals, HT hamstring tendon, LSI limb symmetry index. *Only significant P values are reported
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
a–c LSI (mean and 95% CI) for single-leg-hop test from preoperative to 24 months postoperative and comparison between BPTB and HT groups (a), BPTB/standard rehabilitation and BPTB/accelerated rehabilitation (b) and HT/standard rehabilitation and HT/accelerated rehabilitation (c) groups at each time point. BPTB bone-patellar tendon-bone, CI confidence intervals, HT hamstring tendon, LSI limb symmetry index. *Only significant P values are reported
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Ageberg E, Roos HP, Silbernagel KG, Thomeé R, Roos EM. Knee extension and flexion muscle power after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon graft or hamstring tendons graft: a cross-sectional comparison 3 years post surgery. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009;17(2):162–169. doi: 10.1007/s00167-008-0645-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aglietti P, Giron F, Buzzi R, Biddau F, Sasso F. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: bone-patellar tendon-bone compared with double semitendinosus and gracilis tendon grafts. A prospective, randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86(10):2143–2155. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200410000-00004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ahlbäck S. Osteoarthrosis of the knee. A radiographic investigation. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh) 1968;277:7–72. - PubMed
    1. Ardern CL, Webster KE. Knee flexor strength recovery following hamstring tendon harvest for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review. Orthop Rev (Pavia) 2009;1(2):e12. doi: 10.4081/or.2009.e12. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aune AK, Holm I, Risberg MA, Jensen HK, Steen H. Four-strand hamstring tendon autograft compared with patellar tendon-bone autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2001;29(6):722–728. doi: 10.1177/03635465010290060901. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types