Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec;13(12):2591-2601.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2020.07.045. Epub 2020 Oct 28.

Prognostic Value of Computed Tomography-Derived Extracellular Volume in TAVR Patients With Low-Flow Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis

Affiliations

Prognostic Value of Computed Tomography-Derived Extracellular Volume in TAVR Patients With Low-Flow Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis

Balaji Tamarappoo et al. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Dec.

Abstract

Objectives: The association between extracellular volume (ECV) measured by computed tomography angiography (CTA) and clinical outcomes was evaluated in low-flow low-gradient (LFLG) aortic stenosis (AS) patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).

Background: Patients with LFLG AS comprise a high-risk group with respect to clinical outcomes. Although ECV, a marker of myocardial fibrosis, is traditionally measured with cardiac magnetic resonance, it can also be measured using cardiac CTA. The authors hypothesized that in LFLG AS, increased ECV may be associated with adverse clinical outcomes.

Methods: In 150 LFLG patients with AS who underwent TAVR, ECV was quantified using pre-TAVR CTA. Echocardiographic and clinical information including all-cause death and heart failure rehospitalization (HFH) was obtained from electronic medical records. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate the association between ECV and death+HFH.

Results: During a median follow-up of 13.9 months (range 0.07 to 28.9 months), there were 31 death+HFH events (21%). Patients who experienced death+HFH had a greater median Society of Thoracic Surgery score (9.9 vs. 4.7; p < 0.01), lower left ventricular ejection fraction (42.3 ± 20.2% vs. 52.7 ± 17.2%; p < 0.01), lower mean transvalvular gradient (24.9 ± 8.9 mm Hg vs. 28.1 ± 7.3 mm Hg; p = 0.04) and increased mean ECV (35.5 ± 9.6% vs. 29.9 ± 8.2%; p < 0.01) compared with patients who did not experience death+HFH. In a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model, increase in ECV was associated with increase in death+HFH, (hazard ratio per 1% increase: 1.04, 95% confidence interval: 1.01 to 1.09; p < 0.01).

Conclusions: In patients with LFLG AS, CTA measured increase in ECV is associated with increased risk of adverse clinical outcomes post-TAVR and may thus serve as a useful noninvasive marker for prognostication.

Keywords: aortic stenosis; computed tomography; extracellular volume; low-flow low-gradient; transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Author Disclosures This work was funded by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute grant 7R56HL131871-02 (to Dr. Tamarappoo) and by the Miriam & Sheldon G. Adelson Medical Research Foundation (to Dr. Berman). The authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Patient Selection
A flow diagram of patient selection for retrospective analysis is shown. From 208 patients who underwent TAVR from Dec 2016 to Dec 2017 and with low-flow, low-gradient (LG) severe AS at Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, 150 underwent pre-contrast and delayed post-contrast CT at the time of their CTA for procedural planning of TAVR of whom 150 patients survived to discharge from the hospital and were included in the study.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Case example of a patient with severe AS
Regions of interest were drawn in the septum and lateral wall in the mid-left ventricle in pre-contrast (panel A) and delayed post-contrast (panel B) CT images on axial slices. The yellow region of interest represents blood pool in the left ventricle. Values for CT attenuation in the regions of interest in Hounsfield units are shown. Hematocrit was 33%. Calculated ECV for the septum was (1–0.33) x (95–44) ÷ (135–52) =41% and for the lateral wall was (1–0.33) x (97–45) ÷ (135–52) =42%.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Mean aortic valve gradient compared to ECV
A scatter plot of ECV against mean gradient across the aortic valve illustrates the distribution of ECV in relation to the distribution of mean aortic valve gradients. Patients with ECV ≤33% are represented in orange and patients with ECV >33% are in blue.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.. Survival Analysis of TAVR patients stratified by ECV
A plot of survival probability shows that with progression of time from TAVR, patients with ECV>33% (green) had more events (death and heart failure hospitalization) compared to patients with ECV≤33% (red), p<0.01.
Central Illustration.
Central Illustration.
ECV Quantification from ECG-Gated Cardiac CT Regions of interest were drawn in the septum and lateral wall in the mid-left ventricle in pre-contrast and delayed post-contrast CT images on axial slices. The yellow region of interest represents blood pool in the left ventricle. Values for CT attenuation in the regions of interest in Hounsfield units are shown. Myocardial ECV, expressed as a percentage, was calculated as ECVCT = (1–hematocrit) × (ΔHUmyo/ΔHUblood), where ΔHUmyo and ΔHUblood are given by (HUdelayed – HUearly) of the myocardium and blood pool) Increased ECV is Associated with Death and Heart failure hospitalization A plot of survival probability shows that with progression of time from TAVR, patients with ECV>33% (green) had more events compared to patients with ECV≤33% (red), p<0.01

Comment in

References

    1. Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG. Low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis with normal and depressed left ventricular ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;60:1845–53. - PubMed
    1. Dayan V, Vignolo G, Magne J, Clavel MA, Mohty D, Pibarot P. Outcome and Impact of Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Preserved LVEF and Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015;66:2594–2603. - PubMed
    1. Herrmann HC, Pibarot P, Hueter I et al. Predictors of mortality and outcomes of therapy in low-flow severe aortic stenosis: a Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves (PARTNER) trial analysis. Circulation 2013;127:2316–26. - PubMed
    1. O’Sullivan CJ, Stortecky S, Heg D et al. Clinical outcomes of patients with low-flow, low-gradient, severe aortic stenosis and either preserved or reduced ejection fraction undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Eur Heart J 2013;34:3437–50. - PubMed
    1. Clavel MA, Berthelot-Richer M, Le Ven F et al. Impact of classic and paradoxical low flow on survival after aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015;65:645–53. - PubMed

Publication types