Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec 21;375(1814):20190458.
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0458. Epub 2020 Nov 2.

The territories of governance: unpacking the ontologies and geophilosophies of fixed to flexible ocean management, and beyond

Affiliations

The territories of governance: unpacking the ontologies and geophilosophies of fixed to flexible ocean management, and beyond

Kimberley Peters. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. .

Abstract

This paper offers a conceptual contribution to understanding ocean governance and the management of spaces for the protection of marine biodiversity, organization of extractive industries, the arrangement of global shipping and other 'blue-economy' uses. Rather than focus on one type of management technique (such as a Marine Protected Area (MPA) or example of Marine Spatial Planning), or a site- or species-specific case study of governance, this paper offers a theoretical tracking of the uncharted territories of governance that foreground ocean management approaches. The literature on ocean governance and management techniques predominantly derive from scientific disciplines (which provide the basis for planning) and policy-related social science fields, leaving a lacuna in more critical discussions of ways of knowing and understanding the world that drive it. The paper argues the need to critically understand the ontologies (the regimes of what we believe exists) and geophilosophies (the geographically informed modes of thinking) of territory that underscore ocean management to make sense of its past successes and failures, its present functioning and its future directions. This paper argues that without critical consideration of the kinds of thinking-the ontologies and geophilosophies-that drive ocean management, it will lack the transformative potential many hope it will achieve for sustainable development. This article is part of the theme issue 'Integrative research perspectives on marine conservation'.

Keywords: geophilosophies; management; ocean governance; ontologies; territory.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

I declare I have no competing interests

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Graham E. 2005. Philosophies underlying human geography research. In Methods in human geography: a guide for students doing a research project (eds Flowerdew R., Martin D), pp. 8–33, Second edition London, UK: Routledge.
    1. Johnston R, Gregory D, Pratt G, Watts M. 2002. The dictionary of human geography. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
    1. Jessop B. 1997. The governance of complexity and the complexity of governance: preliminary remarks on some problems and limits of economic guidance. In Beyond market and hierarchy: interactive governance and social complexity (eds Amin A., Hausner J), pp. 111–147. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
    1. Elden S. 2013. The birth of territory. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    1. Storey D. 2001. Territory: the claiming of space. Harlow, UK: Pearson Education.

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources