Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Nov 2;19(1):145.
doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-01184-6.

Influence of community scorecards on maternal and newborn health service delivery and utilization

Elizabeth Ekirapa Kiracho  1 , Noel Namuhani  2 , Rebecca Racheal Apolot  3 , Christine Aanyu  3 , Aloysuis Mutebi  3 , Moses Tetui  3   4 , Suzanne N Kiwanuka  3 , Faith Adong Ayen  5 , Dennis Mwesige  5 , Ahmed Bumbha  5 , Ligia Paina  6 , David H Peters  6
Affiliations

Influence of community scorecards on maternal and newborn health service delivery and utilization

Elizabeth Ekirapa Kiracho et al. Int J Equity Health. .

Abstract

Introduction: The community score card (CSC) is a participatory monitoring and evaluation tool that has been employed to strengthen the mutual accountability of health system and community actors. In this paper we describe the influence of the CSC on selected maternal and newborn service delivery and utilization indicators.

Methods: This was a mixed methods study that used both quantitative and qualitative data collection methods. It was implemented in five sub-counties and one town council in Kibuku district in Uganda. Data was collected through 17 key informant interviews and 10 focus group discussions as well as CSC scoring and stakeholder meeting reports. The repeated measures ANOVA test was used to test for statistical significance. Qualitative data was analyzed manually using content analysis. The analysis about the change pathways was guided by the Wild and Harris dimensions of change framework.

Results: There was an overall improvement in the common indicators across sub-counties in the project area between the 1st and 5th round scores. Almost all the red scores had changed to green or yellow by round five except for availability of drugs and mothers attending Antenatal care (ANC) in the first trimester. There were statistically significant differences in mean scores for men escorting their wives for ante natal care (ANC) (F(4,20) = 5.45, P = 0.01), availability of midwives (F(4,16) =5.77, P < 0.01), availability of delivery beds (F(4,12) =9.00, P < 0.01) and mothers delivering from traditional birth attendants (TBAs), F(4,16) = 3.86, p = 0.02). The qualitative findings suggest that strengthening of citizens' demand, availability of resources through collaborative problem solving, increased awareness about targeted maternal health services and increased top down performance pressure contributed to positive changes as perceived by community members and their leaders.

Conclusions and recommendations: The community score cards created opportunities for community leaders and communities to work together to identify innovative ways of dealing with the health service delivery and utilization challenges that they face. Local leaders should encourage the availability of safe spaces for dialogue between communities, health workers and leaders where performance and utilization challenges can be identified and solutions proposed and implemented jointly.

Keywords: Accountability; Community score cards; Maternal health; Newborn health; Uganda; Utilization.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Community score card Implementation design
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Blake C, et al. Scorecards and social accountability for improved maternal and newborn health services: a pilot in the Ashanti and Volta regions of Ghana. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2016;135(3):372–379. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2016.10.004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Malawi CARE, The community score card (CSC) A generic guide for implementing CARE’s CSC process to improve quality of services. CARE Technical Guidance. Lilongwe: CARE Malawi; 2013.
    1. Edward A, et al. Enhancing governance and health system accountability for people centered healthcare: an exploratory study of community scorecards in Afghanistan. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15(1):299. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0946-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dedu G, Kajubi G. The community scorecard process in the Gambia. Soc Dev Note. 2005;100.
    1. Björkman M, Svensson J. Power to the people: evidence from a randomized field experiment on community-based monitoring in Uganda. Q J Econ. 2009;124(2):735–769. doi: 10.1162/qjec.2009.124.2.735. - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources