Feasibility, acceptability and initial outcome of implementing community scorecard to monitor community level public health facilities: experience from rural Bangladesh
- PMID: 33131505
- PMCID: PMC7604951
- DOI: 10.1186/s12939-020-01265-6
Feasibility, acceptability and initial outcome of implementing community scorecard to monitor community level public health facilities: experience from rural Bangladesh
Abstract
Background: Engaging communities in health facility management and monitoring is an effective strategy to increase health system responsiveness. Many developing countries have used community scorecard (CSC) to encourage community participation in health. However, the use of CSC in health in Bangladesh has been limited. In 2017, icddr,b initiated a CSC process to improve health service delivery at the community clinics (CC) providing primary healthcare in rural Bangladesh. The current study presents learnings around feasibility, acceptability, initial outcome and challenges of implementing CSC at community clinics.
Methods: A pilot study conducted between January'2018-December'2018 explored feasibility and acceptability of CSC using a thematic framework. The tool was implemented in purposively selected three CCs in Chakaria and one CC in Teknaf sub-district of Bangladesh. Qualitative data from 20 Key-Informant Interviews and four Focus Group Discussions with service users, healthcare providers, and government personnel, document reviews and meeting observations were used in analysis.
Results: The study showed that participants were enthusiastic and willing to take part in the CSC intervention. They perceived CSC to be useful in raising awareness about health in the community and facilitating structured monitoring of CC services. The process facilitated building stronger community ownership, enhancing accountability and stakeholder engagement. The participants identified issues around service provision, set SMART (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant and time-bound) targets and indicators on supplies, operations, logistics, environment, and patient satisfaction through CSC. However, some systematic and operational challenges of implementation were identified including time and resource constraint, understanding and facilitation of CSC, provider-user conflict, political influence, and lack of central level monitoring.
Conclusion: The findings suggest that CSC is a feasible and acceptable tool to engage community and healthcare providers in monitoring and managing health facilities. For countries with health systems faced with challenges around accountability, quality and coverage, CSC has the potential to improve community level health-service delivery. The findings are intended to inform program implementers, donors and other stakeholders about context, mechanisms, outcomes and challenges of CSC implementation in Bangladesh and other developing countries. However, proper contextualization, institutional capacity building and policy integration will be critical in establishing effectiveness of CSC at scale.
Keywords: Acceptability; Accountability; Community clinic; Community engagement; Community scorecard; Feasibility.
Conflict of interest statement
None.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Do community scorecards improve utilisation of health services in community clinics: experience from a rural area of Bangladesh.Int J Equity Health. 2020 Nov 2;19(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-01266-5. Int J Equity Health. 2020. PMID: 33131501 Free PMC article.
-
Learnings From a Pilot Study to Strengthen Primary Health Care Services: The Community-Clinic-Centered Health Service Model in Barishal District, Bangladesh.Glob Health Sci Pract. 2021 Mar 15;9(Suppl 1):S179-S189. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-20-00466. Print 2021 Mar 15. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2021. PMID: 33727329 Free PMC article.
-
Identifying influence of perceived quality and satisfaction on the utilization status of the community clinic services; Bangladesh context.Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull. 2015 Apr;41(1):1-12. Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull. 2015. PMID: 27089628
-
What do evaluations tell us about implementing new models in rural and remote primary health care? Findings from a narrative analysis of seven service evaluations conducted by an Australian Centre of Research Excellence.Rural Remote Health. 2017 Jul-Sep;17(3):3926. doi: 10.22605/RRH3296. Epub 2017 Sep 6. Rural Remote Health. 2017. PMID: 28877588 Review.
-
Community engagement in health systems interventions and research in conflict-affected countries: a scoping review of approaches.Glob Health Action. 2022 Dec 31;15(1):2074131. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2022.2074131. Glob Health Action. 2022. PMID: 35762841 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Participatory approaches in primary health care related implementation research in low-and middle-income countries: A narrative review.Public Health Pract (Oxf). 2022 Nov 23;4:100344. doi: 10.1016/j.puhip.2022.100344. eCollection 2022 Dec. Public Health Pract (Oxf). 2022. PMID: 36452907 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Community-based surveillance in internally displaced people's camps and urban settings during a complex emergency in Yemen in 2020.Confl Health. 2021 Jul 5;15(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s13031-021-00394-1. Confl Health. 2021. PMID: 34225760 Free PMC article.
-
A qualitative study of perspectives on the acceptability and feasibility of "virtual home visits" for asthma.BMC Public Health. 2023 Dec 20;23(1):2546. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17485-8. BMC Public Health. 2023. PMID: 38124054 Free PMC article.
-
Social participation in health - case studies from primary health care in Kosovo.BMC Public Health. 2024 Dec 19;24(1):3537. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-21053-z. BMC Public Health. 2024. PMID: 39702073 Free PMC article.
-
Institutionalising community engagement for quality of care: moving beyond the rhetoric.BMJ. 2023 May 15;381:e072638. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-072638. BMJ. 2023. PMID: 37188363 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Bjorkman Nyqvist M, de Walque D, Svensson J. Information is power: experimental evidence on the long-run impact of community based monitoring. 2014.
-
- Fox JA. Social accountability: what does the evidence really say? World Dev. 2015;72:346–361. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.03.011. - DOI
-
- Boydell V, Keesbury J. Improving family planning and reproductive health programs? 2014.
-
- S H. Does community empowerment process increase utilization of health services? An exploratory study in Chakaria, Bangladesh. Dhaka: BRAC University; 2010.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical