Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep;24(9):809-816.
doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23550.

State of Personal Protective Equipment Practice in Indian Intensive Care Units amidst COVID-19 Pandemic: A Nationwide Survey

Affiliations

State of Personal Protective Equipment Practice in Indian Intensive Care Units amidst COVID-19 Pandemic: A Nationwide Survey

Jumana Yusuf Haji et al. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2020 Sep.

Abstract

Background: Optimal personal protective equipment (PPE) preparedness is key to minimize healthcare workers (HCW) infection with COVID-19. This two-phase survey evaluated PPE preparedness (adherence to Ministry of Health India (MoH) PPE-recommendations; HCW-training; PPE-inventory; PPE-breach management) in Indian intensive care units (ICU).

Materials and methods: The phase 1 survey was distributed electronically to intensivists from 481 Indian hospitals between March 25, 2020, and April 06, 2020, as part of a multinational survey. Phase 2 was repeated in 320 Indian hospitals between April 20, 2020, and April 30, 2020.

Results: Response rate was 25% from 22 states. PPE practice varied between states and between private, government, and medical colleges. Between phase 1 and phase 2, all aspects of PPE training improved: donning/doffing 43% vs 66%, respectively; p value <0.01); safe waste disposal practices (38% vs 52%; p value = 0.09); intubation training (18% vs 31%; p value = 0.05); and transport (18% vs 31%; p value = 0.05). Perception of confidence for adequate PPE-training improved from 39 to 53% (p value = 0.26). In all, 47 to 60% ICUs adhered to MoH recommendations. Wearing N95-masks at all times increased from 47 to 60% (p value = 0.89). Very few ICUs provided quantitative/qualitative N95 masks fit testing (12% vs 29%; p value <0.01). Low-cost practices like "buddy-system" for donning-doffing (27% vs 44%; p value = 0.02) and showering after PPE breach (10% vs 8%; p value = 0.63) were underutilized. There was reluctance to PPE reuse. In all, 71% were unaware/diffident about PPE inventory.

Conclusion: Despite interstate variability, most ICUs conformed to MoH recommendations. This survey conducted during initial pandemic phase demonstrated improved PPE preparedness uniformly across India with scope for further improvement. We suggest implementation of quality improvement measures to improve pandemic preparedness and minimize HCW infection rates, focused on regular PPE training, buddy system, and PPE-breach management.

How to cite this article: Haji JY, Subramaniam A, Kumar P, Ramanathan K, Rajamani A. State of Personal Protective Equipment Practice in Indian Intensive Care Units amidst COVID-19 Pandemic: A Nationwide Survey. Indian J Crit Care Med 2020;24(9):809-816.

Keywords: COVID-19; Donning-doffing; HCW infections; Healthcare workers; Personal protective equipment preparedness; Personal protective equipment training; SARS-CoV-2.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Source of support: Nil Conflict of interest: None

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Training patterns in India in phase 1 and phase 2 survey compared to other Asia-Pacific countries (Australia, New Zealand, Hong Kong, Singapore and Philippines) which were surveyed in phase 1. Four main domains (1) donning/doffing (2) Intubation (3) Transporting (4) Training for cleaners and waste disposal
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Personal protective equipment usage pattern compared between two phases of the survey
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
PPE breach and reporting of PPE breach
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Perception of safety and confidence in training and PPE stock between two phases of the survey
Supplmentary Fig. 1
Supplmentary Fig. 1
Training in (1) donning/doffing; (2) Intubation; (3) Transporting; (4) Training for cleaners and waste disposal and comparison between private (P) and government run institutions. (G = government hospitals/medical colleges + PMC = private medical colleges)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. S D. 10 per cent cases linked to hospital infections in Mumbai, point to lack of stringent protocols. Times of India 2020 April 10th 2020.
    1. Morawska L, Cao J. Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2: the world should face the reality. Environ Int. 2020;139:105730. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.105730. DOI: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ong SWX, Tan YK, Chia PY, Lee TH, Ng OT, Wong MSY, et al. Air, surface environmental, and personal protective equipment contamination by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) from a symptomatic patient. JAMA. 2020;323(16):1610–1612. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.3227. DOI: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mehta Y, Chaudhry D, Abraham OC, Chacko J, Divatia J, Jagiasi B, et al. Critical care for COVID-19 affected patients: osition statement of the Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2020;24(4):222–241. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23395. DOI: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rajamani A, Subramaniam A, Shekar K, Haji J, Luo J, Bihari S, et al. Variations in personal protective equipment preparedness in intensive care units during the COVID-19 pandemic: a survey of Asia-pacific countries. medRxiv. 2020;2020

LinkOut - more resources