Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Oct 15;12(10):1133-1145.
doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v12.i10.1133.

Minimally invasive vs open pancreatectomy for nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

Affiliations

Minimally invasive vs open pancreatectomy for nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

Juwan Kim et al. World J Gastrointest Oncol. .

Abstract

Background: The mainstay of treating nonfunctioning-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors(NF-PNETs) is surgical resection. However, minimally invasive approaches to pancreatic resection for treating NF-PNETs are not widely accepted, and the long-term oncological outcomes of such approaches remain unknown.

Aim: To determine the short- and long-term outcomes of minimally invasive pancreatic resection conducted in patients with NF-PNETs.

Methods: Prospective databases from Severance Hospital were searched for 110 patients who underwent curative resection for NF-PNETs between January 2003 and August 2018.

Results: The proportion of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) procedures performed for NF-PNET increased to more than 75% after 2013. There was no significant difference in post-operative complications (P = 0.654), including pancreatic fistula (P = 0.890) and delayed gastric emptying (P = 0.652), between MIS and open approaches. No statistically significant difference was found in disease-free survival between the open approach group and the MIS group (median follow-up period, 28.1 mo; P = 0.428). In addition, the surgical approach (MIS vs open) was not found to be an independent prognostic factor in treating NF-PNET patients [Exp(β) = 1.062; P = 0.929].

Conclusion: Regardless of the type of surgery, a minimally invasive approach can be safe and feasible for select NF-PNET patients.

Keywords: Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy; Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy; Minimally invasive surgery; Nonfunctioning-pancreas neuroendocrine tumor; Oncologic outcome; Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors declare no potential financial interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Changes in surgical approaches for treating nonfunctioning-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors over time. MIS: Minimally invasive surgery.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparison of disease-free survival rates between open pancreatic resection and minimally invasive approaches for treating patients with nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. DFS: Disease-free survival; MIS: Minimally invasive surgery; NF-PNET: Nonfunctioning-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Anderson CW, Bennett JJ. Clinical Presentation and Diagnosis of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2016;25:363–374. - PubMed
    1. Hill JS, McPhee JT, McDade TP, Zhou Z, Sullivan ME, Whalen GF, Tseng JF. Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: the impact of surgical resection on survival. Cancer. 2009;115:741–751. - PubMed
    1. Kang CM, Kim KS, Choi JS, Lee WJ, Kim BR. Experiences with nonfunctioning neuroendocrine neoplasms of the pancreas. Dig Surg. 2005;22:453–458. - PubMed
    1. D'Haese JG, Tosolini C, Ceyhan GO, Kong B, Esposito I, Michalski CW, Kleeff J. Update on surgical treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:13893–13898. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cienfuegos JA, Salguero J, Núñez-Córdoba JM, Ruiz-Canela M, Benito A, Ocaña S, Zozaya G, Martí-Cruchaga P, Pardo F, Hernández-Lizoáin JL, Rotellar F. Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic organ-sparing resection in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a single-center experience. Surg Endosc. 2017;31:3847–3857. - PubMed