Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 May 29;54(6):784-794.
doi: 10.1007/s43465-020-00146-y. eCollection 2020 Nov.

Large Diameter Head in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review

G Neupane  1 , R Madhusudhan  1   2 , A Shrestha  1 , R Vaishya  1   3
Affiliations
Review

Large Diameter Head in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review

G Neupane et al. Indian J Orthop. .

Abstract

Introduction: The literature around use of Large Diameter Heads (LDH) is abundantly available for revision Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) but is lacking for primary uncomplicated THA. This systematic review was undertaken to synthesize data around primary THA involving LDH and analyze the associated complications (dislocation, volumetric wear, implant survivorship and functional score) along with reported effects on range of motion (ROM), patient reported outcomes and impingement rate/groin pain.

Methods: A PRISMA compliant systematic review was done using extensive search in PubMed database, along with offline search looking for the literature published in English language between 2008 and 2018. The articles providing data on the use of large diameter heads (LDH) (36 mm or larger) on various bearing surfaces were collected. This included robust national joint registries of different countries. Narrative approach to data synthesis was used.

Results: A total of 23 papers met our inclusion criteria, including six national joint registries. It was observed that LDH had significantly low dislocation rates, excellent implant survival rate as per Kaplan-Meier survivorship (> 90% at five years). Surgical approaches, except Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS), did not increase any risk of dislocation as long as it was meticulously repaired. There was no significant improvement in any functional scores or improved ROM.

Conclusions: LDH of 32-36 mm are now commonly used in primary THA and is accepted as a popular size. The beneficial effects of a large head size are negated beyond 38 mm. The most favored size for LDH THA, therefore, is 36 mm contrary to the older literature favoring 28 mm.

Keywords: Adverse effect; Bearing surfaces; Dislocation; Primary; Total hip arthroplasty.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interestThe author(s) declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA 2009 four phase flow diagram (from https://www.prisma-statement.org)
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Noordin S, Lakdawala R, Masri BA. Primary total hip arthroplasty: Staying out of trouble intraoperatively. Annals of Medicine and Surgery (London) 2018;29:30–33. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2018.03.043. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Berry DJ, von Knoch M, Schleck CD, Harmsen WS. Effect of femoral head diameter and operative approach on risk of dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery American. 2005;87-A:2456–2463. - PubMed
    1. Bartz RL, Nobel PC, Kadakia NR. The effect of femoral component head size on posterior dislocation of the artificial hip joint. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery American. 2000;9:1300. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200009000-00010. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cross M, Nam D, Mayman D. Ideal femoral head size in total hip arthroplasty balances stability and volumetric wear. HSS Journal Springer-Verlag. 2012;8(3):270–274. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rathi P, Pereira GC, Giordani M. The pros and cons of using larger femoral heads in total hip arthroplasty. American Journal of Orthopedics (Belle Mead NJ) 2013;8:E53. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources