Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Oct 16:6:e28.
doi: 10.15420/cfr.2020.13. eCollection 2020 Mar.

Heart Failure With Mid-range or Recovered Ejection Fraction: Differential Determinants of Transition

Affiliations
Review

Heart Failure With Mid-range or Recovered Ejection Fraction: Differential Determinants of Transition

Davide Margonato et al. Card Fail Rev. .

Abstract

The recent definition of an intermediate clinical phenotype of heart failure (HF) based on an ejection fraction (EF) of between 40% and 49%, namely HF with mid-range EF (HFmrEF), has fuelled investigations into the clinical profile and prognosis of this patient group. HFmrEF shares common clinical features with other HF phenotypes, such as a high prevalence of ischaemic aetiology, as in HF with reduced EF (HFrEF), or hypertension and diabetes, as in HF with preserved EF (HFpEF), and benefits from the cornerstone drugs indicated for HFrEF. Among the HF phenotypes, HFmrEF is characterised by the highest rate of transition to either recovery or worsening of the severe systolic dysfunction profile that is the target of disease-modifying therapies, with opposite prognostic implications. This article focuses on the epidemiology, clinical characteristics and therapeutic approaches for HFmrEF, and discusses the major determinants of transition to HFpEF or HFrEF.

Keywords: AF; Heart failure phenotype; ischaemic aetiology; mid-range ejection fraction; predictors of transition; prognosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:. Main Determinants of Transition from Heart Failure with Mid-range Ejection Fraction
Figure 2:
Figure 2:. Multimodality Imaging Evaluation for Correct Diagnosis, Evidence-Based Therapy and Possible Causes of Transition During Follow-up

References

    1. McMurray JJV, Adamopoulos S, Anker SD et al. ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2012: the Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure 2012 of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in collaboration with the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J. 2012;33:1787–47. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs104. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yancy CW, Jessup M, Bozkurt B et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines. Circulation. 2013;128:e240–327. doi: 10.1161/cir.0b013e31829e8776. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ponikowski P, Voors AA, Anker SD et al. 2016 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: the Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J. 2016;37:2129–200. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw128. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kapoor JR, Kapoor R, Ju C et al. Precipitating clinical factors, heart failure characterization, and outcomes in patients hospitalized with heart failure with reduced, borderline, and preserved ejection fraction. JACC Heart Fail. 2016;4:464–72. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2016.02.017. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lofman I, Szummer K, Dahlstrom U et al. Associations with and prognostic impact of chronic kidney disease in heart failure with preserved, mid-range, and reduced ejection fraction. Eur J Heart Fail. 2017;19:1606–14. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.821. - DOI - PubMed