Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Sep 2:7:583.
doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00583. eCollection 2020.

Clinical Trial Design-A Review-With Emphasis on Acute Intervertebral Disc Herniation

Collaborators, Affiliations
Review

Clinical Trial Design-A Review-With Emphasis on Acute Intervertebral Disc Herniation

Nick D Jeffery et al. Front Vet Sci. .

Abstract

There is a clear need for new methods of treatment of acute disc herniation in dogs, most obviously to address the permanent loss of function that can arise because of the associated spinal cord injury. Clinical trials form the optimal method to introduce new therapies into everyday clinical practice because they are a reliable source of unbiased evidence of effectiveness. Although many designs are available, parallel cohort trials are most widely applicable to acute disc herniation in dogs. In this review another key trial design decision-that between pragmatic and explanatory approaches-is highlighted and used as a theme to illustrate the close relationship between trial objective and design. Acute disc herniation, and acute spinal cord injury, is common in dogs and there is a multitude of candidate interventions that could be trialed. Most current obstacles to large-scale clinical trials in dogs can be overcome by collaboration and cooperation amongst interested veterinarians.

Keywords: durotomy; explanatory; glyburide; pragmatic; spinal cord injury.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Umscheid CA, Margolis DJ, Grossman CE. Key concepts of clinical trials: a narrative review. Postgrad Med. (2011) 123:194–204. 10.3810/pgm.2011.09.2475 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Koppenaal T, Linmans J, Knottnerus JA, Spigt M. Pragmatic vs. explanatory: an adaptation of the PRECIS tool helps to judge the applicability of systematic reviews for daily practice. J Clin Epidemiol. (2011) 64:1095–101. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.11.020 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tosh G, Soares-Weiser K, Adams CE. Pragmatic vs explanatory trials: the pragmascope tool to help measure differences in protocols of mental health randomized controlled trials. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. (2011) 13:209–15. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Thorpe KE, Zwarenstein M, Oxman AD, Treweek S, Furberg CD, Altman DG, et al. . A pragmatic-explanatory continuum indicator summary (PRECIS): a tool to help trial designers. CMAJ. (2009) 180:E47–57. 10.1503/cmaj.090523 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Freedman B. Equipoise and the ethics of clinical research. N Engl J Med. (1987) 317:141–5. 10.1056/NEJM198707163170304 - DOI - PubMed