Comprehensive auditory rehabilitation in adults receiving cochlear implants: A pilot study
- PMID: 33134539
- PMCID: PMC7585234
- DOI: 10.1002/lio2.442
Comprehensive auditory rehabilitation in adults receiving cochlear implants: A pilot study
Abstract
Objective: In the United States, most adults who receive cochlear implants (CIs) do not undergo a comprehensive auditory rehabilitation (CAR) approach, which may result in suboptimal outcomes. The objectives of this pilot study were to demonstrate that a CAR approach incorporating auditory training (AT) by a speech-language pathologist (SLP) is feasible in adults receiving CIs and to explore whether this approach results in improved outcomes.
Methods: Twenty-four postlingually deaf adult CI candidates were serially assigned to one of three groups: (a) a "CAR group" that received standard of care implantation, programming by an audiologist, an additional preoperative counseling session, and eight one-hour AT sessions; (b) a "passive control" standard-of-care group; and (c) an "active control" group that also received the extra preoperative counseling session. Participants were tested preoperatively and 1, 3, and 6 months after CI using measures of word and sentence recognition in quiet and in babble, as well as measures of quality of life (QOL).
Results: The CAR approach was feasible, but this pilot study was underpowered to determine efficacy. Differential time courses of speech recognition improvement were seen for sentence and word recognition. All QOL measurements showed improvement from pre-CI to 1 month post-CI activation. Results revealed issues to consider for a larger-scale study of CAR revolving around participant selection, study measures, and sample size.
Conclusion: The CAR approach is feasible in new CI users. A larger trial is needed to investigate whether CAR leads to better outcomes or faster improvement in this clinical population.
Level of evidence: 2.
Keywords: auditory training; aural rehabilitation; cochlear implants; quality of life; sensorineural hearing loss; speech perception; speech recognition.
© 2020 The Authors. Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Triological Society.
Conflict of interest statement
Aaron C. Moberly serves as a paid consultant for Cochlear Americas and Advanced Bionics, and owns stock and serves as CMO for Otologic Technologies. Kara Vasil and Christin Ray serve as paid consultants for Advanced Bionics.
Similar articles
-
What to Do When Cochlear Implant Users Plateau in Performance: a Pilot Study of Clinician-guided Aural Rehabilitation.Otol Neurotol. 2018 Oct;39(9):e794-e802. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001964. Otol Neurotol. 2018. PMID: 30199497 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Does quality of life depend on speech recognition performance for adult cochlear implant users?Laryngoscope. 2016 Mar;126(3):699-706. doi: 10.1002/lary.25525. Epub 2015 Aug 8. Laryngoscope. 2016. PMID: 26256441
-
Relating quality of life to outcomes and predictors in adult cochlear implant users: Are we measuring the right things?Laryngoscope. 2018 Apr;128(4):959-966. doi: 10.1002/lary.26791. Epub 2017 Aug 4. Laryngoscope. 2018. PMID: 28776711 Free PMC article.
-
Implantable Devices for Single-Sided Deafness and Conductive or Mixed Hearing Loss: A Health Technology Assessment.Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2020 Mar 6;20(1):1-165. eCollection 2020. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2020. PMID: 32194878 Free PMC article.
-
Meta-analysis of quality-of-life improvement after cochlear implantation and associations with speech recognition abilities.Laryngoscope. 2018 Apr;128(4):982-990. doi: 10.1002/lary.26738. Epub 2017 Jul 21. Laryngoscope. 2018. PMID: 28731538 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
A surgeon-scientist's perspective and review of cognitive-linguistic contributions to adult cochlear implant outcomes.Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2020 Nov 6;5(6):1176-1183. doi: 10.1002/lio2.494. eCollection 2020 Dec. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2020. PMID: 33364410 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Knowledge, attitude, and practice toward cochlear implants among deaf patients who received cochlear implants.Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 23;14(1):4451. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-55006-8. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 38396067 Free PMC article.
-
Systematic Review of Auditory Training Outcomes in Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients and Meta-Analysis of Outcomes.J Clin Med. 2024 Jan 11;13(2):400. doi: 10.3390/jcm13020400. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 38256533 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Blamey P, Artieres F, Başkent D, et al. Factors affecting auditory performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants: an update with 2251 patients. Audiol Neurotol. 2013;18(1):36‐47. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials