Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep 1;5(5):911-918.
doi: 10.1002/lio2.442. eCollection 2020 Oct.

Comprehensive auditory rehabilitation in adults receiving cochlear implants: A pilot study

Affiliations

Comprehensive auditory rehabilitation in adults receiving cochlear implants: A pilot study

Aaron C Moberly et al. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. .

Abstract

Objective: In the United States, most adults who receive cochlear implants (CIs) do not undergo a comprehensive auditory rehabilitation (CAR) approach, which may result in suboptimal outcomes. The objectives of this pilot study were to demonstrate that a CAR approach incorporating auditory training (AT) by a speech-language pathologist (SLP) is feasible in adults receiving CIs and to explore whether this approach results in improved outcomes.

Methods: Twenty-four postlingually deaf adult CI candidates were serially assigned to one of three groups: (a) a "CAR group" that received standard of care implantation, programming by an audiologist, an additional preoperative counseling session, and eight one-hour AT sessions; (b) a "passive control" standard-of-care group; and (c) an "active control" group that also received the extra preoperative counseling session. Participants were tested preoperatively and 1, 3, and 6 months after CI using measures of word and sentence recognition in quiet and in babble, as well as measures of quality of life (QOL).

Results: The CAR approach was feasible, but this pilot study was underpowered to determine efficacy. Differential time courses of speech recognition improvement were seen for sentence and word recognition. All QOL measurements showed improvement from pre-CI to 1 month post-CI activation. Results revealed issues to consider for a larger-scale study of CAR revolving around participant selection, study measures, and sample size.

Conclusion: The CAR approach is feasible in new CI users. A larger trial is needed to investigate whether CAR leads to better outcomes or faster improvement in this clinical population.

Level of evidence: 2.

Keywords: auditory training; aural rehabilitation; cochlear implants; quality of life; sensorineural hearing loss; speech perception; speech recognition.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Aaron C. Moberly serves as a paid consultant for Cochlear Americas and Advanced Bionics, and owns stock and serves as CMO for Otologic Technologies. Kara Vasil and Christin Ray serve as paid consultants for Advanced Bionics.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Holden LK, Finley CC, Firszt JB, et al. Factors affecting open‐set word recognition in adults with cochlear implants. Ear Hear. 2013;34(3):342‐360. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blamey P, Artieres F, Başkent D, et al. Factors affecting auditory performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants: an update with 2251 patients. Audiol Neurotol. 2013;18(1):36‐47. - PubMed
    1. Moberly AC, Vasil KJ, Wucinich TL, et al. How does aging affect recognition of spectrally degraded speech? Laryngoscope. 2018;128:(Suppl 5). 10.1002/lary.27457. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fitzpatrick DC, Campbell A, Choudhury B, et al. Round window electrocochleography just prior to cochlear implantation: relationship to word recognition outcomes in adults. Otol Neurotol. 2014;35(1):64‐71. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lawler M, Yu J, Aronoff J. Comparison of the spectral‐temporally modulated ripple test with the Arizona biomedical institute sentence test in cochlear implant users. Ear Hear. 2017;38(6):760‐766. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources