Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Mar 31;4(3):pkaa024.
doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkaa024. eCollection 2020 Jun.

Body Mass Index and Weight Loss in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in CALGB (Alliance)/SWOG 80405

Affiliations

Body Mass Index and Weight Loss in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in CALGB (Alliance)/SWOG 80405

Brendan J Guercio et al. JNCI Cancer Spectr. .

Abstract

Background: In nonmetastatic colorectal cancer, overweight and mild-to-moderately obese patients experience improved outcomes compared with other patients. Obesity's influence on advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is relatively unexplored.

Methods: We conducted a prospective body mass index (BMI) companion study in Cancer and Leukemia Group B (now Alliance)/SWOG 80405, a phase III metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treatment trial. BMI was measured at trial registration. Primary and secondary endpoints were overall and progression-free survival, respectively. To minimize confounding by poor and rapidly declining health, we used Cox proportional hazards regression to adjust for known prognostic factors, comorbidities, physical activity, and weight loss during the 6 months prior to study entry. We also examined weight loss prior to enrollment as an independent predictor of patient outcome. All statistical tests were two-sided.

Results: Among 2323 patients with mCRC, there were no statistically significant associations between BMI and overall or progression-free survival (adjusted P trend = .12 and .40, respectively). Weight loss during the 6 months prior to study entry was associated with shorter overall and progression-free survival; compared with individuals with stable weight ±4.9%, individuals with weight loss greater than 15% experienced an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.52 for all-cause mortality (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.26 to 1.84; P trend < .001) and of 1.23 for disease progression or death (95% CI = 1.02 to 1.47; P trend = .006).

Conclusions: In this prospective study of patients with mCRC, BMI at time of first-line chemotherapy initiation was not associated with patient outcome. Weight loss prior to study entry was associated with increased risk of patient mortality and disease progression.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Derivation of the study cohort. CALGB = Cancer and Leukemia Group B (now Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology); BMI = body mass index. *A voluntary questionnaire administered within 4 weeks after initiating chemotherapy for metastatic disease was used to collect data on weight change over the prior 6 months, asking patients their weight at time of questionnaire completion and 6 months prior.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Multivariable hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for all-cause mortality across strata of patient, treatment, and disease characteristics. The forest plot displays hazard ratios for all-cause mortality comparing patients with morbidly obese BMI (≥35 kg/m2) to patients with normal BMI (21–24.9 kg/m2); other levels of BMI were still included in the model, adjusting with Cox proportional hazards regression for age (continuous years), sex (female, male), ECOG performance status (0, 1, or 2), planned chemotherapy (FOLFIRI, mFOLOFOX6), prior adjuvant chemotherapy (yes, no), prior radiation therapy (yes, no), assigned targeted-treatment arm (bevacizumab, cetuximab, bevacizumab + cetuximab), KRAS (wild-type, mutant, indeterminate/missing), primary tumor location (right/transverse colon, left colon, multiple/missing), physical activity (0–2.9, 3–8.9, 9–17.9, ≥18 MET h/w, missing), percent weight change (loss ≥5%, stable ±4.9%, gain ≥5%), and comorbidity (none, any). BMI = body mass index; ECOG = Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; FOLFIRI = 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan; MET h/w = metabolic equivalent task-hours per week; mFOLFOX6 = 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin. *Tests for trend and interaction used categories of BMI (<21, 21–24.9, 25–29.9, 30–34.9, ≥35 kg/m2) but excluded patients in the lowest BMI category (<21 kg/m2), given that underweight patients may be more likely to have poor or rapidly declining health. P values are 2-sided. †Measured by voluntary questionnaire.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Vainio H, Kaaks R, Bianchini F. Weight control and physical activity in cancer prevention: international evaluation of the evidence. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2002;11(suppl 2):S94–100. - PubMed
    1. Larsson SC, Wolk A. Obesity and colon and rectal cancer risk: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007;86(3):556–565. - PubMed
    1. Giovannucci E, Ascherio A, Rimm EB, Colditz GA, Stampfer MJ, Willett WC. Physical activity, obesity, and risk for colon cancer and adenoma in men. Ann Intern Med. 1995;122(5):327–334. - PubMed
    1. Murphy TK, Calle EE, Rodriguez C, Kahn HS, Thun MJ. Body mass index and colon cancer mortality in a large prospective study. Am J Epidemiol. 2000;152(9):847–854. - PubMed
    1. Martinez ME, Giovannucci E, Spiegelman D, Hunter DJ, Willett WC, Colditz GA. Leisure-time physical activity, body size, and colon cancer in women. Nurses’ Health Study Research Group. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1997;89(13):948–955. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources