Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Aug 21;2(5):e655-e660.
doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2020.06.001. eCollection 2020 Oct.

Is There a Role for Ultrasound in Hip Arthroscopy? A Systematic Review

Affiliations
Review

Is There a Role for Ultrasound in Hip Arthroscopy? A Systematic Review

Brady T Williams et al. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. .

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to identify and summarize the current utility of intraoperative ultrasound (US) during hip arthroscopy.

Methods: A systematic database query of the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, PubMed (1980 to 2019), and Ovid MEDLINE (1980 to 2019) was performed. After article identification, descriptions of the surgical procedure, use of intraoperative US, procedural complications, and conclusions from each article were recorded and summarized.

Results: Five studies met inclusion criteria, all of which were surgical techniques or technical notes. Four of the 5 studies described US used for placement of arthroscopic portals, and 1 described the use of an intraarticular US catheter for the assessment of an osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) lesion. Of the 4 studies using US for portal placement, 3 were performed supine and 1 was performed in the lateral decubitus position. All studies recognized the need for additional US training or the required assistance of a radiologist to incorporate US into a surgical practice.

Conclusion: Descriptions of intraoperative US during hip arthroscopy are limited in the literature. However, existing technique reports demonstrate the feasibility of US for both portal placement with superficial probes and limited evaluation of cartilage using intraarticular US catheters.

Level of evidence: V, systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure
Figure
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) flow chart of the study selection process.

References

    1. Cvetanovich G.L., Chalmers P.N., Levy D.M., et al. Hip arthroscopy surgical volume trends and 30-day postoperative complications. Arthroscopy. 2016;32:1286–1292. - PubMed
    1. Bozic K.J., Chan V., Valone F.H., 3rd, Feeley B.T., Vail T.P. Trends in hip arthroscopy utilization in the United States. J Arthroplasty. 2013;28(8 suppl):140–143. - PubMed
    1. Smart L.R., Oetgen M., Noonan B., Medvecky M. Beginning hip arthroscopy: Indications, positioning, portals, basic techniques, and complications. Arthroscopy. 2007;23:1348–1353. - PubMed
    1. Glick J.M. Hip arthroscopy by the lateral approach. Instr Course Lect. 2006;55:317–323. - PubMed
    1. Kelly B.T., Weiland D.E., Schenker M.L., Philippon M.J. Arthroscopic labral repair in the hip: Surgical technique and review of the literature. Arthroscopy. 2005;21:1496–1504. - PubMed