SARS-CoV-2 IgG/IgM Rapid Test as a Diagnostic Tool in Hospitalized Patients and Healthcare Workers, at a large Teaching Hospital in northern Italy, during the 2020 COVID-19 Pandemic
- PMID: 33135083
SARS-CoV-2 IgG/IgM Rapid Test as a Diagnostic Tool in Hospitalized Patients and Healthcare Workers, at a large Teaching Hospital in northern Italy, during the 2020 COVID-19 Pandemic
Abstract
We describe the outcome of a Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) IgG/IgM rapid test, and discuss the potential suitability of antibody testing. Retrospective single cohort study on patients with suspected Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and asymptomatic Healthcare Workers, enrolled from March to April 2020. Subjects had quantitative PCR (qPCR) test for detection of SARS-CoV-2 via nasal swab and serological testing using the COVID-19 IgG/ IgM Rapid Test (PRIMA Lab SA) immunochromatographic assay. Some subjects underwent chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA) after rapid test. The aim of the study was to analyse the proportion of those who developed a positive IgM/IgG response for SARS-CoV-2. The correspondence between the results from rapid testing and CLIA, when available, was evaluated. 97 subjects underwent qPCR for SARS-CoV-2 through nasal swab, which resulted positive in 40/43 (93.0%) of symptomatic patients, 2/40 (5%) of asymptomatic HCW, in no subjects with suspected COVID- 19 (clinical and radiological findings) then excluded by repeated nasal swabs and alternative diagnosis (COVID-19-negative patients, CNPs), and in 6/6 (100%) of patients with confirmed diagnosis and negative follow-up nasal swabs (COVID-19-recovered patients, CRPs). IgM resulted positive in 8/43 (18.6%) of symptomatic patients and in 1/6 (16.7%) of CRPs. IgG resulted positive in 36/43 (83.7%) of symptomatic patients, 2/40 (5%) of HCW, and in 1/8 (12.5%) and 6/6 (100%) of CNPs and CRPs, respectively. A comparison between an IgG/IgM Rapid Test and a following CLIA test showed consistency in negative results in 25/28 of HCW and 8/8 of CNPs tested. Our preliminary data support the role of IgG/IgM Rapid Test (PRIMA Lab SA) immunochromatographic assay as a point-of-care test that may complement molecular tests in the screening of SARS-CoV-2 carriers. The test may gain particular relevance in shortening the time needed to refer patients to a COVID or non-COVID Hospital area and to achieve diagnosis in patients with persistently negative nasal swabs.
Keywords: COVID-19; IgG/IgM; SARS-CoV-2; antibody; rapid test; serological test.
Similar articles
-
Immunochromatographic test for differentiation detection of IgM and IgG to SARS-CoV-2.Klin Lab Diagn. 2020 Dec 4;65(11):688-692. doi: 10.18821/0869-2084-2020-65-11-688-692. Klin Lab Diagn. 2020. PMID: 33301658 English.
-
Large-scale IgM and IgG SARS-CoV-2 serological screening among healthcare workers with a low infection prevalence based on nasopharyngeal swab tests in an Italian university hospital: Perspectives for public health.Environ Res. 2021 Apr;195:110793. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.110793. Epub 2021 Jan 27. Environ Res. 2021. PMID: 33508260 Free PMC article.
-
Recent Advances in the Evaluation of Serological Assays for the Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 Infection and COVID-19.Front Public Health. 2021 Feb 18;8:620222. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.620222. eCollection 2020. Front Public Health. 2021. PMID: 33681115 Free PMC article.
-
Seropositivity rate and diagnostic accuracy of serological tests in 2019-nCoV cases: a pooled analysis of individual studies.Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2020 Oct;24(19):10208-10218. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202010_23243. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2020. PMID: 33090430 Review.
-
Clinical applications of detecting IgG, IgM or IgA antibody for the diagnosis of COVID-19: A meta-analysis and systematic review.Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Mar;104:415-422. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.01.016. Epub 2021 Jan 12. Int J Infect Dis. 2021. PMID: 33450372 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Advanced Molecular and Immunological Diagnostic Methods to Detect SARS-CoV-2 Infection.Microorganisms. 2022 Jun 10;10(6):1193. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10061193. Microorganisms. 2022. PMID: 35744711 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Complexity of SARS-CoV-2 Infection and the COVID-19 Pandemic.Front Microbiol. 2022 Feb 10;13:789882. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.789882. eCollection 2022. Front Microbiol. 2022. PMID: 35222327 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Detection of Antibody versus Antigen, Optimal Option of Different Serological Assays Based Tests for COVID-19 Diagnosis: A Meta-Analysis.Iran J Public Health. 2023 Jan;52(1):23-36. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v52i1.11662. Iran J Public Health. 2023. PMID: 36824236 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Current and innovative methods for the diagnosis of COVID‑19 infection (Review).Int J Mol Med. 2021 Jun;47(6):100. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2021.4933. Epub 2021 Apr 13. Int J Mol Med. 2021. PMID: 33846767 Free PMC article. Review.
-
COVID-19 Prevention and Control Measures in Workplace Settings: A Rapid Review and Meta-Analysis.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 24;18(15):7847. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18157847. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. PMID: 34360142 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous