Delayed prompting: a review of procedural variations and results
- PMID: 3313553
- DOI: 10.1016/0891-4222(87)90010-2
Delayed prompting: a review of procedural variations and results
Abstract
The delayed prompt procedure transfers stimulus control via the introduction of a time delay between the presentation of a stimulus and a prompt. This procedure has received increasingly greater attention in the literature during the past decade. The present paper reviews 26 studies that used the delayed prompt procedure in applied and laboratory settings. Subjects included developmentally disabled children and adults as well as children of normal intelligence who were taught a wide variety of tasks. Procedural variations across studies were noted in delay length and ceiling, criterion for increasing the delay, mastery criterion, and error correction. Results suggest that the delayed prompt procedure is an efficient teaching stategy, with subjects typically acquiring discriminations within a few training sessions or limited number of trials. However, not all subjects have benefited from the procedure. Additionally, little maintenance data have appeared in the literature, raising questions about long-term effectiveness. Alternative explanations for the reported success of the procedure as well as future areas of research are discussed.
Similar articles
-
A comparison of procedures in teaching self-help skills: increasing assistance, time delay, and observational learning.J Autism Dev Disord. 1989 Mar;19(1):57-72. doi: 10.1007/BF02212718. J Autism Dev Disord. 1989. PMID: 2708304
-
A comparison of time delay and system of least prompts in teaching object identification.Res Dev Disabil. 1987;8(2):283-305. doi: 10.1016/0891-4222(87)90009-6. Res Dev Disabil. 1987. PMID: 3671814
-
Some detrimental effects of using extra stimuli to guide learning in normal and autistic children.J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1976;4(1):59-71. doi: 10.1007/BF00917605. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1976. PMID: 1270699
-
Constant time delay with discrete responses: a review of effectiveness and demographic, procedural, and methodological parameters.Res Dev Disabil. 1992;13(3):239-66. doi: 10.1016/0891-4222(92)90028-5. Res Dev Disabil. 1992. PMID: 1626082 Review.
-
Using response-prompting procedures during small-group direct instruction: outcomes and procedural variations.Am J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2012 Sep;117(5):413-34. doi: 10.1352/1944-7558-117.5.413. Am J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2012. PMID: 22998488 Review.
Cited by
-
The effectiveness of a constant time-delay procedure to teach chained responses to adolescents with mental retardation.J Appl Behav Anal. 1988 Summer;21(2):169-78. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1988.21-169. J Appl Behav Anal. 1988. PMID: 3417580 Free PMC article.
-
Using time delay to promote spontaneous speech in an autistic child.J Appl Behav Anal. 1991 Fall;24(3):591-6. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1991.24-591. J Appl Behav Anal. 1991. PMID: 1752846 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of response prompting procedures in teaching numeral identification to autistic subjects.J Autism Dev Disord. 1988 Dec;18(4):627-36. doi: 10.1007/BF02211880. J Autism Dev Disord. 1988. PMID: 3215888
-
Sample stimulus control shaping and restricted stimulus control in capuchin monkeys: a methodological note.J Exp Anal Behav. 2011 May;95(3):387-98. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2011.95-387. J Exp Anal Behav. 2011. PMID: 21547073 Free PMC article.
-
Constant and progressive time delay procedures for teaching children with autism: a literature review.J Autism Dev Disord. 2008 Feb;38(2):261-75. doi: 10.1007/s10803-007-0390-4. Epub 2007 Jun 2. J Autism Dev Disord. 2008. PMID: 17546491 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Miscellaneous