Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb;69(2):547-555.
doi: 10.1111/jgs.16879. Epub 2020 Nov 2.

Detecting Delirium: A Systematic Review of Identification Instruments for Non-ICU Settings

Benjamin K I Helfand  1   2 , Madeline L D'Aquila  3 , Patricia Tabloski  4 , Kristen Erickson  3 , Jirong Yue  5 , Tamara G Fong  3   6 , Tammy T Hshieh  3   7 , Eran D Metzger  8 , Eva M Schmitt  3 , Edwin D Boudreaux  1 , Sharon K Inouye  3 , Richard N Jones  2
Affiliations

Detecting Delirium: A Systematic Review of Identification Instruments for Non-ICU Settings

Benjamin K I Helfand et al. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Feb.

Abstract

Background/objectives: Delirium manifests clinically in varying ways across settings. More than 40 instruments currently exist for characterizing the different manifestations of delirium. We evaluated all delirium identification instruments according to their psychometric properties and frequency of citation in published research.

Design: We conducted the systematic review by searching Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Cochrane Library, Excerpta Medica Database (Embase), PsycINFO, PubMed, and Web of Science from January 1, 1974, to January 31, 2020, with the keywords "delirium" and "instruments," along with their known synonyms. We selected only systematic reviews, meta-analyses, or narrative literature reviews including multiple delirium identification instruments.

Measurements: Two reviewers assessed the eligibility of articles and extracted data on all potential delirium identification instruments. Using the original publication on each instrument, the psychometric properties were examined using the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) framework.

Results: Of 2,542 articles identified, 75 met eligibility criteria, yielding 30 different delirium identification instruments. A count of citations was determined using Scopus for the original publication for each instrument. Each instrument underwent methodological quality review of psychometric properties using COSMIN definitions. An expert panel categorized key domains for delirium identification based on criteria from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)-III through DSM-5. Four instruments were notable for having at least two of three of the following: citation count of 200 or more, strong validation methodology in their original publication, and fulfillment of DSM-5 criteria. These were, alphabetically, Confusion Assessment Method, Delirium Observation Screening Scale, Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98, and Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale.

Conclusion: Four commonly used and well-validated instruments can be recommended for clinical and research use. An important area for future investigation is to harmonize these measures to compare and combine studies on delirium.

Keywords: delirium; measurement; psychometrics; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Systematic Review Flow Diagram
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Domain coverage of 4 recommended delirium instruments
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Oh ES, Fong TG, Hshieh TT, Inouye SK. Delirium in older persons: Advances in diagnosis and treatment. JAMA. 2017;318(12):1161–1174. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Breitbart W, Gibson C, Tremblay A. The delirium experience: delirium recall and delirium-related distress in hospitalized patients with cancer, their spouses/caregivers, and their nurses. Psychosomatics. 2002;43(3):183–194. - PubMed
    1. MacLullich AM, Hall RJ. Who understands delirium? In: Oxford University Press; 2011:412–414. - PubMed
    1. Inouye SK, Foreman MD, Mion LC, Katz KH, Cooney LM Jr. Nurses’ recognition of delirium and its symptoms: comparison of nurse and researcher ratings. Archives of internal medicine. 2001;161(20):2467–2473. - PubMed
    1. Inouye SK, Bogardus ST Jr, Charpentier PA, et al. A multicomponent intervention to prevent delirium in hospitalized older patients. New England journal of medicine. 1999;340(9):669–676. - PubMed

Publication types