Outcomes of Endoscopic Versus Open Skull Base Surgery in Pediatric Patients
- PMID: 33135787
- DOI: 10.1002/lary.29127
Outcomes of Endoscopic Versus Open Skull Base Surgery in Pediatric Patients
Abstract
Objective/hypothesis: To characterize the pathology and outcomes of skull base surgery in the pediatric population by open versus endoscopic surgical approach.
Study design: Retrospective cohort study.
Methods: A retrospective review of pediatric patients (<18 years) who underwent skull base surgery for nonmalignant disease from May 2000 to August 2019 was performed. Patient demographics, pathology, and operative characteristics by surgical approach were recorded and analyzed. Patients with a combined endoscopic/open approach were classified as open for the analysis.
Results: Eighty-two pediatric skull base patients were identified with a mean age of 11.3 years (standard deviation 5.2). A purely endoscopic approach was used in 63 (77%) patients, a purely open approach was used in nine (11%) patients, and a combined open/endoscopic approach was used in 10 (12%) patients. The all-cause complication rate was 9.8%. There was no statistically significant difference in rate of complications between patients with an open versus endoscopic approach for resection (15.8% vs. 7.9%; P = .379). Risk of having a complication did not significantly vary by patient age. The odds of having a complication with an open approach was not statistically significant in a multivariable model adjusted for age, sex, race, intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak, tracheostomy requirement, and vascular flap use (odds ratio 2.76, 95% confidence interval 0.28-26.94; P = .383).
Conclusions: Our retrospective study demonstrates a similar risk of complication for open versus endoscopic approach to resection in pediatric skull base patients at our institution. Safety and feasibility of the endoscopic approach has previously been demonstrated in children, and this is the first study to directly compare outcomes with open approaches.
Level of evidence: 4 Laryngoscope, 131:996-1001, 2021.
Keywords: Skull base; complications; pediatrics; safety; surgical procedures.
© 2020 American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society Inc, "The Triological Society" and American Laryngological Association (ALA).
Similar articles
-
Risk factors associated with postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak after endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery.J Neurosurg. 2018 Apr;128(4):1066-1071. doi: 10.3171/2016.12.JNS1694. Epub 2017 Jun 9. J Neurosurg. 2018. PMID: 28598276
-
CSF leak after endoscopic skull base surgery in children: A single institution experience.Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Apr;119:22-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2019.01.010. Epub 2019 Jan 11. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2019. PMID: 30660855
-
Outcomes of Open vs Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery in Patients 70 Years or Older.JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018 Oct 1;144(10):923-928. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2018.1948. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018. PMID: 30326054 Free PMC article.
-
Endonasal endoscopic surgery for pediatric anterior cranial fossa encephaloceles: A systematic review.Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 May;132:109919. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.109919. Epub 2020 Feb 1. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2020. PMID: 32036168
-
Endoscopic endonasal versus open transcranial resection of anterior midline skull base meningiomas.World Neurosurg. 2012 May-Jun;77(5-6):713-24. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2011.08.025. Epub 2011 Nov 7. World Neurosurg. 2012. PMID: 22120296 Review.
Cited by
-
Neurosurgical Treatment and Outcome of Pediatric Skull Base Lesions: A Case Series and Review of the Literature.Children (Basel). 2023 Jan 26;10(2):216. doi: 10.3390/children10020216. Children (Basel). 2023. PMID: 36832345 Free PMC article.
-
Anatomical Parameters and Growth of the Pediatric Skull Base: Endonasal Access Implications.J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2022 Jul 5;84(4):336-348. doi: 10.1055/a-1862-0321. eCollection 2023 Aug. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2022. PMID: 37408579 Free PMC article.
References
BIBLIOGRAPHY
-
- Rawal RB, Farzal Z, Federspiel JJ, Sreenath SB, Thorp BD, Zanation AM. Endoscopic resection of Sinonasal malignancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2016;155:376-386. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599816646968.
-
- Roxbury CR, Ishii M, Richmon JD, Blitz AM, Reh DD, Gallia GL. Endonasal endoscopic surgery in the management of sinonasal and anterior skull base malignancies. Head Neck Pathol 2016;10:13-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12105-016-0687-8.
-
- Farquhar D, Kim L, Worrall D, et al. Propensity score analysis of endoscopic and open approaches to malignant paranasal and anterior skull base tumor outcomes. Laryngoscope 2016;126:1724-1729. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.25885.
-
- Fu TS, Monteiro E, Witterick I, et al. Costs and perioperative outcomes associated with open versus endoscopic resection of sinonasal malignancies with skull base involvement. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2017;78:430-440. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1603907.
-
- Stephenson ED, Lee SE, Adams K, et al. Outcomes of open vs endoscopic skull base surgery in patients 70 years or older. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2018;144:923-928. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2018.1948.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials