Comparison of Ligament Isometry and Patellofemoral Contact Pressures for Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Techniques in Skeletally Immature Patients
- PMID: 33135907
- DOI: 10.1177/0363546520966609
Comparison of Ligament Isometry and Patellofemoral Contact Pressures for Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Techniques in Skeletally Immature Patients
Abstract
Background: Adult medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction techniques are not appropriate for the skeletally immature patient given the proximity of the distal femoral physis. Biomechanical consequences of reconstructions aimed at avoiding the physis have not been adequately studied.
Purpose: To quantify the biomechanical effects of MPFL reconstruction techniques intended for skeletally immature patients.
Study design: Controlled laboratory study.
Methods: Four MPFL reconstruction techniques were evaluated using a computationally augmented cadaveric model: (1) Schoettle point: adult-type reconstruction; (2) epiphyseal: socket distal to the femoral physis; (3) adductor sling: graft wrapped around the adductor tendon; (4) adductor transfer: adductor tendon transferred to patella. A custom testing frame was used to cycle 8 knees for each technique from 10° to 110° of flexion. Patellofemoral kinematics were recorded using a motion camera system, contact stresses were recorded using Tekscan pressure sensors, and MPFL length was computed using an inverse kinematics computational model. Change in MPFL length, patellar facet forces, and patellar kinematics were compared using generalized estimating equation modeling.
Results: Schoettle point reconstruction was the most isometric, demonstrating isometry from 10° to 100°. The epiphyseal technique was isometric until 60°, after which the graft loosened with increasing flexion. The adductor sling and adductor transfer techniques were significantly more anisometric from 40° to 110°. Both grafts tightened with knee flexion and resulted in significantly more lateral patellar tilt versus the intact state in early flexion and significantly higher contact forces on the medial facet versus the epiphyseal technique in late flexion.
Conclusion: In this cadaveric simulation, the epiphyseal technique allowed for a more isometric ligament until midflexion, when the patella engaged within the trochlear groove. The adductor sling and adductor transfer grafts became tighter in flexion, resulting in potential loss of motion, pain, graft stretching, and failure. Marginal between-condition differences in patellofemoral contact mechanics and patellar kinematics were observed in late flexion.
Clinical relevance: In the skeletally immature patient, using an epiphyseal type MPFL reconstruction with the femoral attachment site distal to the physis results in a more isometric graft compared with techniques with attachment sites proximal to the physis.
Keywords: MPFL; contact pressure; knee; medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction; patellar instability; skeletally immature.
Similar articles
-
The effect of femoral tunnel position and graft tension on patellar contact mechanics and kinematics after medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction.Am J Sports Med. 2014 Feb;42(2):364-72. doi: 10.1177/0363546513509230. Epub 2013 Nov 25. Am J Sports Med. 2014. PMID: 24275861
-
Comparison of Patellofemoral Kinematics and Stability After Medial Patellofemoral Ligament and Medial Quadriceps Tendon-Femoral Ligament Reconstruction.Am J Sports Med. 2020 Jul;48(9):2252-2259. doi: 10.1177/0363546520930703. Epub 2020 Jun 18. Am J Sports Med. 2020. PMID: 32551965
-
Are the tubular grafts in the femoral tunnel in an anatomical or isometric position in the reconstruction of medial patellofemoral ligament?Int Orthop. 2013 Oct;37(10):1933-41. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-1938-x. Epub 2013 Jun 16. Int Orthop. 2013. PMID: 23771189 Free PMC article.
-
Properties and Function of the Medial Patellofemoral Ligament: A Systematic Review.Am J Sports Med. 2020 Mar;48(3):754-766. doi: 10.1177/0363546519841304. Epub 2019 May 15. Am J Sports Med. 2020. PMID: 31091114
-
Inconsistencies in Reporting Risk Factors for Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Failure: A Systematic Review.Am J Sports Med. 2022 Mar;50(3):867-877. doi: 10.1177/03635465211003342. Epub 2021 Apr 29. Am J Sports Med. 2022. PMID: 33914648
Cited by
-
Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction in the Pediatric Population: Skeletal Immaturity Does Not Affect Functional Outcomes but Demonstrates Increased Rate of Subsequent Knee Injury.Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2022 Aug 8;4(5):e1589-e1599. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2022.05.007. eCollection 2022 Oct. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2022. PMID: 36312705 Free PMC article.
-
The Adductor Sling Technique for Pediatric Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Better Resists Dislocation Loads When Compared With Adductor Transfer at Time Zero in a Cadaveric Model.Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2023 Dec 12;6(1):100831. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2023.100831. eCollection 2024 Feb. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2023. PMID: 38169763 Free PMC article.
-
pressuRe: an R package for analyzing and visualizing biomechanical pressure distribution data.Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 5;13(1):16776. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-44041-6. Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 37798383 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical Insights into the Treatment of Patellofemoral Instability with Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction: Pearls and Pitfalls-Lessons Learned from 20 Years.J Pers Med. 2023 Aug 9;13(8):1240. doi: 10.3390/jpm13081240. J Pers Med. 2023. PMID: 37623490 Free PMC article.
-
Combined Reconstruction of the Medial Patellofemoral Ligament and Medial Quadriceps Tendon Femoral Ligament in Skeletally Immature Patients.Arthrosc Tech. 2022 Dec 21;12(1):e59-e64. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2022.08.058. eCollection 2023 Jan. Arthrosc Tech. 2022. PMID: 36814983 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources