Caregiver engagement practices in National Cancer Institute Clinical Oncology Research Program settings: Implications for research to advance the field
- PMID: 33136296
- PMCID: PMC7854890
- DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33296
Caregiver engagement practices in National Cancer Institute Clinical Oncology Research Program settings: Implications for research to advance the field
Abstract
Background: Supportive care interventions have demonstrated benefits for both informal and/or family cancer caregivers and their patients, but uptake generally is poor. To the authors' knowledge, little is known regarding the availability of supportive care services in community oncology practices, as well as engagement practices to connect caregivers with these services.
Methods: Questions from the National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP)'s 2017 Landscape Survey examined caregiver engagement practices (ie, caregiver identification, needs assessment, and supportive care service availability). Logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between the caregiver engagement outcomes and practice group characteristics.
Results: A total of 204 practice groups responded to each of the primary outcome questions. Only 40.2% of practice groups endorsed having a process with which to systematically identify and document caregivers, although approximately 76% were routinely using assessment tools to identify caregiver needs and approximately 63.7% had supportive care services available to caregivers. Caregiver identification was more common in sites affiliated with a critical access hospital (odds ratio [OR], 2.44; P = .013), and assessments were less common in safety-net practices (OR, 0.41; P = .013). Supportive care services were more commonly available in the Western region of the United States, in practices with inpatient services (OR, 2.96; P = .012), and in practices affiliated with a critical access hospital (OR, 3.31; P = .010).
Conclusions: Although many practice groups provide supportive care services, fewer than one-half systematically identify and document informal cancer caregivers. Expanding fundamental engagement practices such as caregiver identification, assessment, and service provision will be critical to support recent calls to improve caregivers' well-being and skills to perform caregiving tasks.
Keywords: assessment; cancer; caregiving; oncology; supportive care.
© 2020 American Cancer Society.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
References
-
- Cancer Caregiving ∣ National Alliance for Caregiving. Accessed July 8, 2016 http://www.caregiving.org/cancer/
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
- UCA189972B/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- UG1 CA189867/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- UG1 CA189974/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- UG1 CA233160/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- UG1 CA189828/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- UG1 CA189972/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- UG1 CA189824/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- L30 CA231709/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- K07 CA190529/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- R25 CA122061/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- P30 CA012197/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- KL2 TR001421/TR/NCATS NIH HHS/United States
- UL1 TR001420/TR/NCATS NIH HHS/United States