Optimized implementation of cardiac resynchronization therapy: a call for action for referral and optimization of care: A joint position statement from the Heart Failure Association (HFA), European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), and European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) of the European Society of Cardiology
- PMID: 33136300
- DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.2046
Optimized implementation of cardiac resynchronization therapy: a call for action for referral and optimization of care: A joint position statement from the Heart Failure Association (HFA), European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), and European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) of the European Society of Cardiology
Abstract
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is one of the most effective therapies for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and leads to improved quality of life, reductions in heart failure hospitalization rates and all-cause mortality. Nevertheless, up to two-thirds of eligible patients are not referred for CRT. Furthermore, post-implantation follow-up is often fragmented and suboptimal, hampering the potential maximal treatment effect. This joint position statement from three European Society of Cardiology Associations, Heart Failure Association (HFA), European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) and European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI), focuses on optimized implementation of CRT. We offer theoretical and practical strategies to achieve more comprehensive CRT referral and post-procedural care by focusing on four actionable domains: (i) overcoming CRT under-utilization, (ii) better understanding of pre-implant characteristics, (iii) abandoning the term 'non-response' and replacing this by the concept of disease modification, and (iv) implementing a dedicated post-implant CRT care pathway.
Keywords: Cardiac resynchronization therapy; Care pathways; Disease management; Disease modification; Heart failure; Implementation; Outcome; Response; Utilization.
© the Author(s) 2020. This article has been co-published with permission in European Journal of Heart Failure (published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology) and EP Europace.
Comment in
-
Why mechanical dyssynchrony remains relevant to cardiac resynchronization therapy. Letter regarding the article 'Optimized implementation of cardiac resynchronization therapy: a call for action for referral and optimization of care: a joint position statement from the Heart Failure Association (HFA), European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), and European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) of the European Society of Cardiology'.Eur J Heart Fail. 2021 May;23(5):843-844. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.2150. Epub 2021 Mar 24. Eur J Heart Fail. 2021. PMID: 33704878 No abstract available.
-
Reply to 'Why mechanical dyssynchrony remains relevant to cardiac resynchronization therapy'.Eur J Heart Fail. 2021 May;23(5):844-845. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.2180. Epub 2021 Apr 8. Eur J Heart Fail. 2021. PMID: 33788355 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Optimized implementation of cardiac resynchronization therapy: a call for action for referral and optimization of care.Europace. 2021 Aug 6;23(8):1324-1342. doi: 10.1093/europace/euaa411. Europace. 2021. PMID: 34037728
-
Why mechanical dyssynchrony remains relevant to cardiac resynchronization therapy. Letter regarding the article 'Optimized implementation of cardiac resynchronization therapy: a call for action for referral and optimization of care: a joint position statement from the Heart Failure Association (HFA), European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), and European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) of the European Society of Cardiology'.Eur J Heart Fail. 2021 May;23(5):843-844. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.2150. Epub 2021 Mar 24. Eur J Heart Fail. 2021. PMID: 33704878 No abstract available.
-
The European CRT Survey: 1 year (9-15 months) follow-up results.Eur J Heart Fail. 2012 Jan;14(1):61-73. doi: 10.1093/eurjhf/hfr158. Eur J Heart Fail. 2012. PMID: 22179034
-
Integration of implantable device therapy in patients with heart failure. A clinical consensus statement from the Heart Failure Association (HFA) and European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).Eur J Heart Fail. 2024 Feb;26(2):483-501. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.3150. Epub 2024 Jan 25. Eur J Heart Fail. 2024. PMID: 38269474 Review.
-
European cardiac resynchronization therapy survey: rationale and design.Eur J Heart Fail. 2009 Mar;11(3):326-30. doi: 10.1093/eurjhf/hfp030. Eur J Heart Fail. 2009. PMID: 19228801 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Don't just fit and forget: incremental benefit of optimisation of medical therapy post-cardiac resynchronisation therapy.Clin Med (Lond). 2022 Jul;22(Suppl 4):27-28. doi: 10.7861/clinmed.22-4-s27. Clin Med (Lond). 2022. PMID: 36220242 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Add-on Sacubitril/Valsartan Therapy Induces Left Ventricular Remodeling in Non-responders to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy to a Similar Extent as in Heart Failure Patients Without Resynchronization.Cardiol Ther. 2024 Mar;13(1):149-161. doi: 10.1007/s40119-023-00346-1. Epub 2024 Jan 12. Cardiol Ther. 2024. PMID: 38216822 Free PMC article.
-
Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing versus Biventricular Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy on Morbidity and Mortality.Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2024 Jun;38(3):471-481. doi: 10.1007/s10557-022-07410-3. Epub 2022 Dec 2. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2024. PMID: 36459266
-
[New pacing strategies for heart failure].Inn Med (Heidelb). 2024 Aug;65(8):778-786. doi: 10.1007/s00108-024-01747-7. Epub 2024 Jul 5. Inn Med (Heidelb). 2024. PMID: 38967707 Review. German.
-
Predicting the survival benefit of cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator function for non-ischemic heart failure-Role of the Goldenberg risk score.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Jan 10;9:1062094. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1062094. eCollection 2022. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023. PMID: 36704467 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Abraham WT, Fisher WG, Smith AL, Delurgio DB, Leon AR, Loh E, Kocovic DZ, Packer M, Clavell AL, Hayes DL, Ellestad M, Trupp RJ, Underwood J, Pickering F, Truex C, McAtee P, Messenger J; MIRACLE (Multicenter InSync Randomized Clinical Evaluation) Study Group. Cardiac resynchronization in chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med 2002;346:1845-1853.
-
- Abraham WT, Young JB, Leon AR, Adler S, Bank AJ, Hall SA, Lieberman R, Liem LB, O'Connell JB, Schroeder JS, Wheelan KR; Multicenter InSync ICD II Study Group. Effects of cardiac resynchronization on disease progression in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction, an indication for an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, and mildly symptomatic chronic heart failure. Circulation 2004;110:2864-2868.
-
- Bristow MR, Saxon LA, Boehmer J, Krueger S, Kass DA, De Marco T, Carson P, DiCarlo L, DeMets D, White BG, DeVries DW, Feldman AM; Comparison of Medical Therapy, Pacing, and Defibrillation in Heart Failure (COMPANION) Investigators. Cardiac-resynchronization therapy with or without an implantable defibrillator in advanced chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med 2004;350:2140-2150.
-
- Cleland JG, Daubert JC, Erdmann E, Freemantle N, Gras D, Kappenberger L, Tavazzi L; Cardiac Resynchronization-Heart Failure (CARE-HF) Study Investigators. The effect of cardiac resynchronization on morbidity and mortality in heart failure. N Engl J Med 2005;352:1539-1549.
-
- Linde C, Abraham WT, Gold MR, St John SM, Ghio S, Daubert C; REVERSE (REsynchronization reVErses Remodeling in Systolic left vEntricular dysfunction) Study Group. Randomized trial of cardiac resynchronization in mildly symptomatic heart failure patients and in asymptomatic patients with left ventricular dysfunction and previous heart failure symptoms. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52:1834-1843.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous