Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Nov/Dec;41(6):1431-1441.
doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000889.

Systematic Review on Late Cochlear Implantation in Early-Deafened Adults and Adolescents: Predictors of Performance

Affiliations

Systematic Review on Late Cochlear Implantation in Early-Deafened Adults and Adolescents: Predictors of Performance

Joke A Debruyne et al. Ear Hear. 2020 Nov/Dec.

Abstract

Objectives: Early-deafened, late-implanted adolescents and adults constitute a unique group of cochlear implant (CI) users, showing a large variability in outcomes. The current systematic review aimed to determine which preimplantation factors are relevant in predicting postoperative outcomes in this patient group.

Design: A systematic search for studies published between 2000 and September 2017 was performed in five electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane library, CINAHL, and PsycInfo). Prognostic studies that assessed the relation between patient-related factors and CI outcomes in early-deafened but late-implanted adolescent and adult CI users were included. Study quality was assessed with the Quality In Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool.

Results: The systematic search and subsequent full-text evaluation identified 13 studies that had a clear prognostic study goal. Eight out of these 13 studies had a high risk of bias for at least one of the five QUIPS domains. Analysis of the outcomes identified that communication mode (in childhood), preoperative speech intelligibility, and preoperative speech recognition scores were significantly related to speech perception outcomes for this group of CI users. A number of additional factors considered worth for further investigation were also identified.

Conclusions: The analysis of the studies assessing the effect of a number of patient-related factors on outcome with CI in early-deafened adolescents and adults identified three potential prognostic factors and a number of additional factors to be incorporated in future research. More high-quality prognosis studies in the investigated patient population are still needed.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Arisi E., Forti S., Pagani D., Todini L., Torretta S., Ambrosetti U., Pignataro L. Cochlear implantation in adolescents with prelinguistic deafness. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, (2010). 142:804–808.
    1. Blamey P., Artieres F., Baskent D., Bergeron F., Beynon A., Burke E., Dillier N., Dowell R., Fraysse B., Gallégo S., Govaerts P. J., Green K., Huber A. M., Kleine-Punte A., Maat B., Marx M., Mawman D., Mosnier I., O'Connor A. F., O'Leary S., et al. Factors affecting auditory performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants: an update with 2251 patients. Audiol Neurootol, (2013). 18:36–47.
    1. Bosco E., Nicastri M., Ballantyne D., Viccaro M., Ruoppolo G., Ionescu Maddalena A., Mancini P. Long-term results in late implanted adolescent and adult CI recipients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, (2013). 270:2611–2620.
    1. Campbell R., MacSweeney M., Woll B. Cochlear implantation (CI) for prelingual deafness: the relevance of studies of brain organization and the role of first language acquisition in considering outcome success. Front Hum Neurosci, (2014). 8:834.
    1. Caposecco A., Hickson L., Pedley K. Cochlear implant outcomes in adults and adolescents with early-onset hearing loss. Ear Hear, (2012). 33:209–220.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources