Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Nov/Dec;41(6):1533-1544.
doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000867.

Operationalization of the Brief ICF Core Set for Hearing Loss: An ICF-Based e-Intake Tool in Clinical Otology and Audiology Practice

Affiliations

Operationalization of the Brief ICF Core Set for Hearing Loss: An ICF-Based e-Intake Tool in Clinical Otology and Audiology Practice

Lisette M van Leeuwen et al. Ear Hear. 2020 Nov/Dec.

Abstract

Objectives: According to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), functioning reflects the interplay between an individual's body structures and functions, activities, participation, environmental, and personal factors. To be useful in clinical practice, these concepts need to be operationalized into a practical and integral instrument. The Brief ICF Core Set for Hearing Loss (CSHL) provides a minimum standard for the assessment of functioning in adults with hearing loss. The objective of the present study was to operationalize the Brief CSHL into a digital intake tool that could be used in the otology-audiology practice for adults with ear and hearing problems as part of their intake assessment.

Design: A three-step approach was followed: (1) Selecting and formulating questionnaire items and response formats, using the 27 categories of the Brief CSHL as a basis. Additional categories were selected based on relevant literature and clinical expertise. Items were selected from existing, commonly used disease-specific questionnaires, generic questionnaires, or the WHO's official descriptions of ICF categories. The response format was based on the existing item's response categories or on the ICF qualifiers. (2) Carrying out an expert survey and a pilot study (using the three-step test interview. Relevant stakeholders and patients were asked to comment on the relevance, comprehensiveness, and comprehensibility of the items. Results were discussed in the project group, and items were modified based on consensus. (3) Integration of the intake tool into a computer-based system for use in clinical routine.

Results: The Brief CSHL was operationalized into 62 items, clustered into six domains: (1) general information, including reason for visit, sociodemographic, and medical background; (2) general body functions; (3) ear and hearing structures and functions; (4) activities and participation (A&P); (5) environmental factors (EF); and (6) personal factors (mastery and coping). Based on stakeholders' responses, the instructions of the items on A&P and EF were adapted. The three-step test interview showed that the tool had sufficient content validity but that some items on EF were redundant. Overall, the stakeholders and patients indicated that the intake tool was relevant and had a logical and clear structure. The tool was integrated in an online portal.

Conclusions: In the current study, an ICF-based e-intake tool was developed that aims to screen self-reported functioning problems in adults with an ear/hearing problem. The relevance, comprehensiveness, and comprehensibility of the originally proposed item list was supported, although the stakeholder and patient feedback resulted into some changes of the tool on item-level. Ultimately, the functioning information obtained with the tool could be used to promote patient-centered ear and hearing care taking a biopsychosocial perspective into account.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflict of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of this article.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Logic model of the intake tool’s feedback mechanisms, in which an integral assessment of the patient is obtained. *Prefereably the patient completes the intake tool at home, at a time and moment of their own choosing. When this is not possible, the intake tool can be completed in the waiting room. ICF, International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Modified from Greenhalgh et al. (2017).
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Example of electronic functioning profile, domain activities, and participation, using traffic lights. Note: This figure is purely illustrative and not based on cutoffs.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alfakir R., Hall M., Holmes A. E. How can the success post cochlear implant be measured or defined in older adults? Implications of the International Classification of Functioning Brief Core Set for Hearing Loss. Int J Phys Med Rehabil, (2015a). 32
    1. Alfakir R., Holmes A. E., Noreen F. Functional performance in older adults with hearing loss: Application of the International Classification of Functioning Brief Core Set for Hearing Loss: A pilot study. Int J Audiol, (2015b). 54:579–586. - PubMed
    1. Alfakir R., van Leeuwen L. M., Pronk M., et al. Comparing the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health Core Sets for Hearing Loss and Otorhinolaryngology/Audiology Intake Documentation at Mayo Clinic. Ear Hear, (2019). 40:858–869. - PubMed
    1. Asplund R. Sleepiness and sleep in elderly subjects with hearing complaints. Arch Gerontol Geriatr, (2003). 36:93–99. - PubMed
    1. Barker A. B., Leighton P., Ferguson M. A. Coping together with hearing loss: A qualitative meta-synthesis of the psychosocial experiences of people with hearing loss and their communication partners. Int J Audiol, (2017). 56:297–305. - PubMed

Publication types