Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec 1;41(4):496-503.
doi: 10.1097/WNO.0000000000001137.

Variability Within Optic Nerve Optical Coherence Tomography Measurements Distinguishes Papilledema From Pseudopapilledema

Affiliations

Variability Within Optic Nerve Optical Coherence Tomography Measurements Distinguishes Papilledema From Pseudopapilledema

Alexis M Flowers et al. J Neuroophthalmol. .

Abstract

Background: To report a linear risk score obtained using clock-hour optical coherence tomography (OCT) data from papilledema and pseudopapilledema nerves that differentiates between the 2 diagnoses with high sensitivity and specificity.

Methods: Patients presenting to a single neuro-ophthalmologist with papilledema or pseudopapilledema were included for a retrospective review. The absolute consecutive difference in OCT retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness between adjacent clock hours and the mean magnitude of thickness for clock hours 1-12 were compared between the 2 groups using mixed-effect models adjusting for age and clock hour with a random intercept for subjects and eyes (nested within subject). The area under the curve (AUC) for the receiver operating characteristics curve and a separate calibration curve was used to evaluate potential clinical usage.

Results: Forty-four eyes with papilledema and 72 eyes with pseudopapilledema, 36 of whom had optic nerve drusen met criteria. The papilledema group had a higher mean RNFL thickness (papilledema = 163 ± 68 µm, pseudopapilledema = 82 ± 22 µm, P < 0.001). The papilledema groups also had more variability between consecutive clock hours (papilledema = 57 ± 20 µm, pseudopapilledema = 26 ± 11 µm, P < 0.001). A linear combination of each patient's averaged values separated the 2 groups with an AUC of 98.4% (95% CI 95.5%-100%) with an optimized sensitivity of 88.9% and specificity of 95.5% as well as good calibration (mean absolute error = 0.015).

Conclusions: Patients with papilledema have higher intrinsic variability and magnitude within their OCT, and this finding reliably distinguishes them from those with pseudopapilledema.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Costello F, Malmqvist L, Hamann S. The role of optical coherence tomography in differentiating optic disc drusen from optic disc edema. Asia-Pacific J Ophthalmol. 2018;7:271–279.
    1. Rigi M, Almarzouqi SJ, Morgan ML, Lee AG. Papilledema: epidemiology, etiology, and clinical management. Eye and brain. 2015;7:47.
    1. Hoyt WF, Pont ME. Pseudopapilledema: anomalous elevation of optic disk: pitfalls in diagnosis and management. JAMA. 1962;181:191–196.
    1. Freund P, Margolin E. Pseudopapilledema. In. StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing; 2019. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK538291/ .
    1. Chiang J, Wong E, Whatham A, Hennessy M, Kalloniatis M, Zangerl B. The usefulness of multimodal imaging for differentiating pseudopapilloedema and true swelling of the optic nerve head: a review and case series. Clin Exp Optom. 2015;98:12–24.

Publication types

Supplementary concepts

LinkOut - more resources