Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec:23:321-326.
doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2020.10.011. Epub 2020 Oct 31.

Distribution of smf-1, rmlA, spgM and rpfF genes among Stenotrophomonas maltophilia isolates in relation to biofilm-forming capacity

Affiliations
Free article

Distribution of smf-1, rmlA, spgM and rpfF genes among Stenotrophomonas maltophilia isolates in relation to biofilm-forming capacity

Akram Azimi et al. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2020 Dec.
Free article

Abstract

Objectives: The molecular mechanisms involved in biofilm formation inStenotrophomonas maltophilia are poorly understood. Here, we examined whether the presence of smf-1, rmlA, spgM and rpfF genes is associated with biofilm formation and antibiotic resistance in S. maltophilia.

Methods: A total of 150 S. maltophilia isolates were collected from three tertiary-care hospitals in Iran and were identified through PCR amplification of the 23S rRNA gene. Biofilm formation was determined by microtitre plate assay. Presence of smf-1, rmlA, spgM and rpfF genes was examined by PCR.

Results: Among the isolates examined, 148 (98.7%) were able to produce biofilm, of which 69 (46.0%) were strong biofilm-producers, whereas 32 (21.3%) and 47 (31.3%) were moderate and weak biofilm-producers, respectively. The frequency ofsmf-1, rmlA, spgM and rpfF was 99.3%, 98.0%, 97.3% and 70.0%, respectively. Statistical analysis indicated a direct correlation between presence of the rpfF gene and biofilm formation (P < 0.001). The high prevalence of smf-1 (99.3%) among the isolates is noted and there was a significant association between smf-1 and biofilm-forming ability (P < 0.01), but lower than rpfF. Additionally, a direct association was found between resistance to ticarcillin/clavulanate, ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin and doxycycline and strong biofilm formation in the S. maltophilia isolates (P < 0.01).

Conclusion: This study demonstrated thatS. maltophilia clinical isolates significantly differ in biofilm-forming ability. Moreover, presence of rpfF and smf-1, but not spgM, could be associated with biofilm formation. This study highlights the importance of rpfF in formation of biofilm compared with the other genes involved.

Keywords: Biofilm formation; Stenotrophomonas maltophilia; rmlA; rpfF; smf-1; spgM.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources