Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr;40(2):191-196.
doi: 10.14366/usg.20100. Epub 2020 Sep 1.

Focused ultrasound and prostate cancer

Affiliations

Focused ultrasound and prostate cancer

Sung Kyu Hong et al. Ultrasonography. 2021 Apr.

Abstract

Focused ultrasound (FUS) has been utilized for the treatment of localized prostate cancer. Initially, FUS was performed as a whole-gland treatment comparable to radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy. However, after overall downward stage migration due to health screening programs involving prostate-specific antigen testing, as well as advances in conservative or observative strategies such as active surveillance, FUS has evolved from a whole-gland treatment to a focal treatment. This new treatment technique aims to ablate tumors while preserving the normal prostate tissue, thereby ensuring better preservation of urinary and erectile function. In this article, we review the mechanism and clinical outcomes of the FUS procedure.

Keywords: Focused ultrasound; High intensity focused ultrasound; Prostatic neoplasms.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.. Some possibility of empty spots and missing lesions always exists during ablation.
A. The yellow circles indicate the well-aligned theoretical focal points in the preoperative ablation plan. B. Errors and missing lesions between the ablated points are possible due to prostate movement and/or swelling. The red circle indicates a theoretical missing spot during ablation.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.. Magnetic resonance images from a 73-year-old man with prostate cancer who was treated with left hemi-ablation using focused ultrasound with transurethral prostatectomy.
A, C. The prostate size was estimated as 44 cc based on a preoperative T2-weighted image (A, axial image on the mid-prostate; C, sagittal image at the midline). B, D. At 6 months after focused ultrasound ablation (left hemi-ablation), the size of the remaining prostate was estimated as 6-7 mL with negative prostate biopsies in both lobes (B, axial image; D, sagittal image).

References

    1. Lynn JG, Zwemer RL, Chick AJ, Miller AE. A new method for the generation and use of focused ultrasound in experimental biology. J Gen Physiol. 1942;26:179–193. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gelet A, Chapelon JY, Bouvier R, Pangaud C, Lasne Y. Local control of prostate cancer by transrectal high intensity focused ultrasound therapy: preliminary results. J Urol. 1999;161:156–162. - PubMed
    1. Maloney E, Hwang JH. Emerging HIFU applications in cancer therapy. Int J Hyperthermia. 2015;31:302–309. - PubMed
    1. Billroth T. Surgical experience. Zurich 1860-67. Arch Klin Chir. 1869;10:548–549.
    1. Kirschner-Hermanns R, Jakse G. Quality of life following radical prostatectomy. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2002;43:141–151. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources