Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb;100(2):187-193.
doi: 10.1177/0022034520970536. Epub 2020 Nov 2.

SARS-CoV-2 Detection in Gingival Crevicular Fluid

Affiliations

SARS-CoV-2 Detection in Gingival Crevicular Fluid

S Gupta et al. J Dent Res. 2021 Feb.

Abstract

Understanding the pathophysiology of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection remains a significant challenge of our times. The gingival crevicular fluid being representative of systemic status and having a proven track record of detecting viruses and biomarkers forms a logical basis for evaluating the presence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The study aimed to assess gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) for evidence of SARS-CoV-2 in 33 patients who were deemed to be COVID-19 positive upon nasopharyngeal sampling. An attempt was also made to comparatively evaluate it with saliva in terms of its sensitivity, as a diagnostic fluid for SARS-CoV-2. GCF and saliva samples were collected from 33 COVID-19-confirmed patients. Total RNA was extracted using NucliSENS easyMAG (bioMérieux) and eluted in the elution buffer. Envelope gene (E gene) of SARS-CoV-2 and human RNase P gene as internal control were detected in GCF samples by using the TRUPCR SARS-CoV-2 RT qPCR kit V-2.0 (I) in an Applied Biosystems 7500 real-time machine. A significant majority of both asymptomatic and mildly symptomatic patients exhibited the presence of the novel coronavirus in their GCF samples. Considering the presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in the nasopharyngeal swab sampling as gold standard, the sensitivity of GCF and saliva, respectively, was 63.64% (confidence interval [CI], 45.1% to 79.60%) and 64.52% (CI, 45.37% to 80.77%). GCF was found to be comparable to saliva in terms of its sensitivity to detect SARS-CoV-2. Saliva samples tested positive in 3 of the 12 patients whose GCF tested negative, and likewise GCF tested positive for 2 of the 11 patients whose saliva tested negative on real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. The results establish GCF as a possible mode of transmission of SARS-CoV-2, which is the first such report in the literature, and also provide the first quantifiable evidence pointing toward a link between the COVID-19 infection and oral health.

Keywords: COVID-19; diagnostics; oral health; oral hygiene; periodontal; saliva.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure.
Figure.
Comparison of Ct values between different clinical samples. (A) Patient matched samples, represented by the connecting lines. A blue line represents nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) pairing with gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) or saliva sample while a black line represents pairing between GCF and saliva. (B) All positive nasopharyngeal swabs (n = 33), GCF (n = 21), and saliva samples (n = 20) were compared. Mean Ct value is represented by a horizontal line in each group.

Comment in

  • Taking Stock of COVID-19.
    Jakubovics NS. Jakubovics NS. J Dent Res. 2021 Feb;100(2):113-114. doi: 10.1177/0022034520984713. J Dent Res. 2021. PMID: 33470896 No abstract available.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Al Saiegh F, Ghosh R, Leibold A, Avery MB, Schmidt RF, Theofanis T, Mouchtouris N, Philipp L, Peiper SC, Wang ZX, et al. 2020. Status of SARS-CoV-2 in cerebrospinal fluid of patients with COVID-19 and stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 91(8):846–848. - PubMed
    1. Badran Z, Gaudin A, Struillou X, Amador G, Soueidan A. 2020. Periodontal pockets: a potential reservoir for SARS-CoV-2? Med Hypotheses. 143:109907. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ceron JJ, Lamy E, Martinez-Subiela S, Lopez-Jornet P, Capela-Silva F, Eckersall PD, Tvarijonaviciute A. 2020. Use of saliva for diagnosis and monitoring the SARS-CoV-2: a general perspective. J Clin Med. 9(5):1491. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Coccolini F, Tartaglia D, Puglisi A, Geiodarno C, Pistello M, Chiarugi M, Lodatom N. 2020. SARS-CoV-2 is present in peritoneal fluid in COVID-19 patients. Ann Surg. 272(3):e240–e242. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fakheran O, Dehghannejad M, Khademi A. 2020. Saliva as a diagnostic specimen for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in suspected patients: a scoping review. Infect Dis Poverty. 9(1):100. - PMC - PubMed