Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr;49(3):557-570.
doi: 10.3758/s13421-020-01109-2. Epub 2020 Nov 2.

Do metaphorical sharks bite? Simulation and abstraction in metaphor processing

Hamad Al-Azary  1 , Albert N Katz  2
Affiliations

Do metaphorical sharks bite? Simulation and abstraction in metaphor processing

Hamad Al-Azary et al. Mem Cognit. 2021 Apr.

Erratum in

Abstract

In a metaphor such as lawyers are sharks, the concept lawyers, which is the metaphor topic, and the concept sharks, which is the metaphor vehicle, interact to produce a figurative meaning such that lawyers are predatory. Some theorists argue that sensorimotor properties of the vehicle are the basis of metaphor comprehension. Accordingly, the metaphor lawyers are sharks is processed as a simulation in which bodily actions related to sharks are accessed (e.g., sharks chasing prey). In contrast, the long-standing assumption is that metaphors are processed as abstractions with no role played by sensorimotor properties. From this theoretical perspective, abstract characteristics of sharks (e.g., vicious, predatory) are argued to be the core properties involved in metaphor processing. Here, we juxtapose these two opposing views of metaphor processing using cross-modal lexical priming. We find evidence that low-familiar metaphors (e.g., highways are snakes) prime bodily-action associates (i.e., slither) but not abstraction associates (i.e., danger), and are hence processed via simulation, whereas high-familiar metaphors (e.g., lawyers are sharks) prime abstraction associates (i.e., killer) but not bodily-action associates (i.e., bite) and are therefore processed via abstraction. The results align with views of cognition and language that posit the presence of both embodied and abstract representations.

Keywords: Metaphor; Psycholinguistics; Semantic priming; Speech perception.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Cortese, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., Kessler, B., Loftis, B., Neely, J.H., Nelson, D.L., Simpson, G.R.& Treiman, R. (2007). The English lexicon project. Behavior Research Methods, 39(3), 445-459. - PubMed
    1. Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(4), 577–660.
    1. Blasko, D. G., & Connine, C. M. (1993). Effects of familiarity and aptness on metaphor processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition, 19, 295-308.
    1. Barsalou, L. W., Santos, A., Simmons, W. K., & Wilson, C. D. (2008). Language and simulation in conceptual processing. Symbols, Embodiment, and Meaning, 245–283.
    1. Bowdle, B. F., & Gentner, D. (2005). The career of metaphor. Psychological Review, 112 (1), 193–216. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources