Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Dec;46(12):2464-2476.
doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06290-1. Epub 2020 Nov 2.

Extracorporeal life support for adults with acute respiratory distress syndrome

Affiliations
Review

Extracorporeal life support for adults with acute respiratory distress syndrome

Alain Combes et al. Intensive Care Med. 2020 Dec.

Abstract

Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) can support gas exchange in patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). During ECLS, venous blood is drained from a central vein via a cannula, pumped through a semipermeable membrane that permits diffusion of oxygen and carbon dioxide, and returned via a cannula to a central vein. Two related forms of ECLS are used. Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), which uses high blood flow rates to both oxygenate the blood and remove carbon dioxide, may be considered in patients with severe ARDS whose oxygenation or ventilation cannot be maintained adequately with best practice conventional mechanical ventilation and adjunctive therapies, including prone positioning. Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO2R) uses lower blood flow rates through smaller cannulae and provides substantial CO2 elimination (~ 20-70% of total CO2 production), albeit with marginal improvement in oxygenation. The rationale for using ECCO2R in ARDS is to facilitate lung-protective ventilation by allowing a reduction of tidal volume, respiratory rate, plateau pressure, driving pressure and mechanical power delivered by the mechanical ventilator. This narrative review summarizes physiological concepts related to ECLS, as well as the rationale and evidence supporting ECMO and ECCO2R for the treatment of ARDS. It also reviews complications, limitations, and the ethical dilemmas that can arise in treating patients with ECLS. Finally, it discusses future key research questions and challenges for this technology.

Keywords: Acute respiratory failure; Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; Mechanical ventilation; Outcome.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

AC reports grants from Getinge, personal fees from Getinge, Baxter and Xenios outside the submitted work. AC is also the recent past president of the EuroELSO organization and a member of the executive and scientific committees for ECMONet. MS reported personal fees from Getinge, Drager, and Xenios, outside the submitted work. MS is also member of the Data Committee for ECMONet. CH is a member of the steering and scientific committees for ECMONet. EF reports personal fees from ALung Technologies, Fresenius Medical Care, Getinge, and MC3 Cardiopulmonary outside the submitted work. NF reports consulting fees from Getinge and Xenios. NF is a member of the executive and scientific committees for ECMONet. JF is current president of Asia Pacific ELSO, Exec of ECMOnet, and has received grant funding from Getinge, Xenios, Drager and CSL. He is co-founder of BiVACOR (mechanical support device). He declares no personal fees. SJ reports receiving consulting fees from Drager, Fresenius-Xenios, Baxter, Medtronic, and Fisher & Paykel. AP reports perrsonal fees for consulting/lectures from Maquet, Xenios, Baxter, and Boehringer Ingelheim. AS is on the medical advisory boards for Baxter and Xenios. Hs is Chair of the Scientific Committee of the International ECMO Network (ECMONet). DB receives research support from ALung Technologies. He has been on the medical advisory boards for Baxter, Abiomed, Xenios and Hemovent. DB is also the President-elect of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) and the Chair of the Executive Committee of the International ECMO Network (ECMONet). The other authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest related to the purpose of this manuscript.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Three different modalities of ECLS for acute respiratory distress syndrome. A Femoro-jugular venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) which enables full oxygenation and carbon dioxide removal in the acute phase of ARDS. Typical mechanical ventilation settings (EOLIA settings) aim to further protect the lung by reducing VT, RR, and ∆P; B Dual-lumen jugular VV-ECMO is an alternative cannulation strategy; C Extra-corporeal CO2 removal, which may facilitate lung-protective ventilation by allowing a reduction of VT, Pplat, RR, ∆P and mechanical power (SUPERNOVA pilot settings) by ensuring partial carbon dioxide removal with marginal oxygenation in mild-to-moderate ARDS. VCV volume-controlled ventilation, PEEP positive end-expiratory pressure, VT tidal volume, Pplat plateau pressure, BIPAP/APRV biphasic positive airway pressure/airway pressure release ventilation, RR respiratory rate, ∆P driving pressure, Fr French, ARDS acute respiratory distress syndrome, ECLS extracorporeal life support, MV mechanical ventilation, FdO2 fraction on oxygen in the sweep gas, MO, membrane oxygenator, Qecmo (QE) ECMO flow in L/min. Major changes between the three settings are highlighted in bold font. a Modified EOLIA settings with a set RR lower than in EOLIA. Decreasing respiratory rate (< 10–15 breaths/min) to reduce mechanical power seems desirable, although it may be achieved in most ARDS patients only with deep sedation and neuromuscular blockade
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
VV-ECMO weaning algorithm in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. VV-ECMO venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, VCV volume-controlled ventilation, PEEP positive end-expiratory pressure, VT tidal volume, Pplat plateau pressure, BIPAP/APRV biphasic positive airway pressure/airway pressure release ventilation, Phigh high pressure, Plow low pressure, RR respiratory rate, MV mechanical ventilation, FdO2 fraction on oxygen in the sweep gas, PBW predicted body weight, H hour. a Modified EOLIA settings with a set RR lower than in EOLIA. Decreasing respiratory rate (< 10–15 breaths/min) to reduce mechanical power seems desirable, although it may be achieved in most ARDS patients only with deep sedation and neuromuscular blockade
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Clinical management and daily monitoring of ECMO for ARDS. VV-ECMO venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, VCV volume-controlled ventilation, PEEP positive end-expiratory pressure, VT tidal volume, Pplat plateau pressure, RR respiratory rate, ∆P driving pressure, BIPAP/APRV biphasic positive airway pressure/airway pressure release ventilation, Phigh high pressure, Plow low pressure, UFH Unfractionated heparin, aPTT activated partial thromboplastin time, PK/PD pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamics, RASS richmond agitation-sedation scale, P0.1 drop in airway pressure observed during the first 100 ms of an inspiratory effort made against the occluded airway opening, Pven venous pressure (i.e. inlet pressure) on ECMO, Part arterial pressure (i.e., outlet pressure) on ECMO, ∆P on ECMO trans-membrane oxygenator pressure gradient or pressure drop, i.e., the difference betweenthe pressure of the blood at the inlet and at the outlet of the membrane lung, usually 10–50 mmHg. a Modified EOLIA settings with a set RR lower than in EOLIA

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bellani G, Laffey JG, Pham T, et al. Epidemiology, patterns of care, and mortality for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome in intensive care units in 50 countries. JAMA. 2016;315:788–800. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0291. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network; Brower RG, Matthay MA, Morris A, Schoenfeld D, Thompson BT, Wheeler A (2000) Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 342:1301–1308 - PubMed
    1. Fan E, Karagiannidis C. Less is More: not (always) simple—the case of extracorporeal devices in critical care. Intensive Care Med. 2019;45:1451–1453. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05726-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gattinoni L, Vassalli F, Romitti F, et al. Extracorporeal gas exchange: when to start and how to end? Crit Care Lond Engl. 2019;23:203. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2437-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bartlett RH, Roloff DW, Custer JR, et al. Extracorporeal life support: the University of Michigan experience. JAMA J Am Med Assoc. 2000;283:904–908. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.7.904. - DOI - PubMed