Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2021 Feb;22(2):247-258.
doi: 10.1007/s11121-020-01181-9. Epub 2020 Nov 3.

The Role of Engagement in Effective, Digital Prevention Interventions: the Function of Engagement in the REAL Media Substance Use Prevention Curriculum

Kathryn Greene  1 , Hye Jeong Choi  2 , Shannon D Glenn  3   4 , Anne E Ray  5 , Michael L Hecht  4
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

The Role of Engagement in Effective, Digital Prevention Interventions: the Function of Engagement in the REAL Media Substance Use Prevention Curriculum

Kathryn Greene et al. Prev Sci. 2021 Feb.

Abstract

Prevention curricula rely on audience engagement to effectively communicate their messages. However, to date, measurement of engagement has primarily focused on self-report that is often an indicator of liking or satisfaction. Emerging technologies for intervention delivery hold promise not only for additional engagement indicators but also for dissemination outside of traditional vehicles such as classroom delivery. The present study, grounded in the theory of active involvement (Greene 2013), explores the role of engagement (as measured by self-report, program analytics, and observation) with short-term substance use prevention outcomes such as self-efficacy to counter-argue and descriptive and injunctive norms. The study tracks 4-H youth (N = 310) engaged with a media literacy focused e-learning substance prevention curriculum, REAL media. Results indicate that self-reports of engagement predicted self-efficacy to counter-argue, but a program-analytic indicator of dosage predicted lower injunctive and descriptive norms, all at 3 months. The observational indicator was correlated with self-efficacy to counter-argue but not significant in the predictive models. The implications and directions for future research regarding how engagement is measured in prevention and included in studying program effects are discussed. Clinical trial: NCT03157700, May 2017.

Keywords: E-learning; Engagement; Health messages; Involvement; Media literacy; Prevention; Substance use.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest: Kathryn Greene and Michael Hecht disclose intellectual property interests in the REAL media curriculum.

References

    1. Appleton JJ, Christenson SL, Kim D, & Reschly AL (2006). Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: Validation of the student engagement instrument. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 427–445. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2006.04.002 - DOI
    1. Appleton JJ, Christenson SL, & Furlong MJ (2008). Student engagement with school: Critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct. Psychology in the Schools, 45(5), 369–386. doi:10.1002/pits.20303 - DOI
    1. Arnett J (1992). Reckless behavior in adolescence: A developmental perspective. Developmental Review, 12, 339–373. doi:10.1016/0273-2297(92)90013-R - DOI
    1. Bandura A (1986). The explanatory and predictive scope of Self-Efficacy Theory. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 4, 359–373. 10.1521/iscp.1986.4.3.359 - DOI
    1. Banerjee SC, Greene K, Magsamen-Conrad K, Elek E, & Hecht ML (2015). Interpersonal communication outcomes of a media literacy alcohol prevention curriculum. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 5, 425–432. doi:10.1007/s13142-015-0329-9 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data