Brain malformations and cognitive performance in spina bifida
- PMID: 33140418
- DOI: 10.1111/dmcn.14717
Brain malformations and cognitive performance in spina bifida
Abstract
Aim: To systematically characterize radiological features of patients with spina bifida, their relationship to cognitive function, and differences between spina bifida aperta (SBA) and spina bifida occulta (SBO).
Method: In a retrospective study of 265 patients (117 females, 148 males; median age at imaging 11y, range 1-47y; SBA n=206, SBO n=59), the radiological phenotype was assessed through magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (SBA n=171, SBO n=59). In 126 patients (SBA n=116, SBO n=10) Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (KABC) or Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, Fourth Edition (WISC-IV) and Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV) were performed.
Results: Patients with spina bifida show numerous brain malformations, always present for SBA but rarely for SBO. The most frequent brain malformations in SBA included abnormal corpus callosum (69%), hypoplastic pons (50%), and hypoplastic mesencephalon (20%). Cognitive total IQ scores were below average in 44% (KABC) to 49% (WISC-IV) of children with SBA, while almost all children with SBO scored at least average. Stenogyria (p=0.006), pons (p=0.003), and mesencephalon hypoplasia (p=0.01) correlated with lower total IQ score and verbal comprehension. Various brain malformations correlate significantly with several cognitive domains, while lesion level only correlates with processing speed.
Interpretation: IQ scores were significantly lower in patients with SBA than in patients with SBO. Verbal competence, perceptual reasoning, and working memory were significantly impaired for SBA and correlated with stenogyria and abnormalities of the midbrain and corpus callosum.
What this paper adds: Brain malformations occur more frequently in spina bifida aperta (SBA) than in spina bifida occulta (SBO). Cognitive impairment is less frequent in SBO. Hydrocephalus, stenogyria, midbrain, and corpus callosum abnormalities are associated with lower cognitive function. Difference in prognosis in SBO versus SBA can alter prenatal counselling.
© 2020 The Authors. Developmental Medicine & ChildNeurology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Mac Keith Press.
Comment in
-
Brain malformations and spina bifida.Dev Med Child Neurol. 2021 Mar;63(3):244. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.14745. Epub 2020 Nov 24. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2021. PMID: 33236354 No abstract available.
References
-
- Dolk H. Epidemiologic approaches to identifying environmental causes of birth defects. Am J Med Gene 2004; 125C: 4-11.
-
- Copp AJ, Stanier P, Greene NDE. Neural tube defects: recent advances, unsolved questions, and controversies. Lancet Neuro 2013; 12: 799-810.
-
- Copp AJ, Greene NDE. Neural tube defects. Annu Rev Neurosci 2015; 37: 217-30.
-
- Juranek J, Salman MS. Anomalous development of brain structure and function in spina bifida myelomeningocele. Dev Disabil Res Rev 2010; 16: 23-30.
-
- Crawley JT, Hasan K, Hannay HJ, et al. Structure, integrity, and function of the hypoplastic corpus callosum in spina bifida myelomeningocele. Brain Connect 2014; 4: 608-18.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
