Final 5-year outcomes following aortic valve replacement with a RESILIA™ tissue bioprosthesis
- PMID: 33141188
- PMCID: PMC7850021
- DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezaa311
Final 5-year outcomes following aortic valve replacement with a RESILIA™ tissue bioprosthesis
Abstract
Objectives: Long-term durability of bioprosthetic valves is predominantly limited by structural valve deterioration. RESILIA™ tissue has exhibited reduced calcification in pre-clinical and early clinical studies. This study evaluated the 5-year clinical and haemodynamic outcomes of an aortic valve with this tissue.
Methods: This was a prospective, non-randomized, single-arm study of 133 patients implanted with a RESILIA aortic bioprosthesis between July 2011 and February 2013 at 2 sites in Poland. Clinical outcomes and haemodynamic performance were assessed annually for 5 years post-implant. Safety events were adjudicated by a Clinical Events Committee and echocardiographic data were assessed by an independent core laboratory.
Results: Mean patient age was 65.3 ± 13.5 years, with 34 patients (25.6%) ≤60. The mean follow-up was 4.2 ± 1.5 years. Early (≤30 days) and late (>30 days) all-cause mortality were 2.3% (N = 3) and 3.2%/late patients-years (N = 18) respectively. Early events included thromboembolism in 3 patients (2.3%). Late valve-related events included endocarditis in 1 patient, which led to explant, and valve thrombosis in another patient. There were no events of structural valve deterioration throughout the study. At 5 years, mean gradient was 14.8 ± 7.6 mmHg and effective orifice area was 1.4 ± 0.5 cm2, a marked improvement over baseline values. All New York Heart Association class III patients and most class II patients at baseline had improved classifications at 5 years.
Conclusions: The bioprosthesis with RESILIA tissue demonstrated a good safety profile with excellent haemodynamic performance over 5 years of follow-up. These encouraging outcomes warrant additional investigation of this novel tissue.
Clinical trial registration number: NCT01651052.
Keywords: Aortic valve replacement; Bioprosthesis; RESILIA.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery.
Figures
Comment in
-
Reply to Condello.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022 May 27;61(6):1450. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezab388. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022. PMID: 34435629 No abstract available.
-
Long-term durability and resilient tissue: 'the future end of valve in valve!'.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022 May 27;61(6):1450. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezab386. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022. PMID: 34435634 No abstract available.
References
-
- Falk V, Baumgartner H, Bax JJ, De Bonis M , Hamm C, Holm PJ. et al. 2017 ESC/EACTS guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. The task force for the management of valvular heart disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS).Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2017;52:616–64. - PubMed
-
- Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Erwin JP III, Fleisher LA. et al. 2017 AHA/ACC focused update of the 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2017;135:e1159–95. - PubMed
-
- Bartus K, Sadowski J, Litwinowicz R, Filip G, Jasinski M, Deja M. et al. Changing trends in aortic valve procedures over the past ten years-from mechanical prosthesis via stented bioprosthesis to TAVI procedures-analysis of 50,846 aortic valve cases based on a Polish National Cardiac Surgery Database. J Thorac Dis 2019;11:2340–9. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Litwinowicz R, Bartus K, Drwila R, Kapelak B, Konstanty-Kalandyk J, Sobczynski R. et al. In-hospital mortality in cardiac surgery patients after readmission to the intensive care unit: a single-center experience with 10,992 patients. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2015;29:570–5. - PubMed
-
- Rodriguez-Caulo EA, Macias D, Adsuar A, Ferreiro A, Arias-Dachary J, Parody G. et al. Biological or mechanical prostheses for isolated aortic valve replacement in patients aged 50–65 years: the ANDALVALVE study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2019;55:1160–7. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
