Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan 29;59(2):434-441.
doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezaa311.

Final 5-year outcomes following aortic valve replacement with a RESILIA™ tissue bioprosthesis

Affiliations

Final 5-year outcomes following aortic valve replacement with a RESILIA™ tissue bioprosthesis

Krzysztof Bartus et al. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. .

Abstract

Objectives: Long-term durability of bioprosthetic valves is predominantly limited by structural valve deterioration. RESILIA™ tissue has exhibited reduced calcification in pre-clinical and early clinical studies. This study evaluated the 5-year clinical and haemodynamic outcomes of an aortic valve with this tissue.

Methods: This was a prospective, non-randomized, single-arm study of 133 patients implanted with a RESILIA aortic bioprosthesis between July 2011 and February 2013 at 2 sites in Poland. Clinical outcomes and haemodynamic performance were assessed annually for 5 years post-implant. Safety events were adjudicated by a Clinical Events Committee and echocardiographic data were assessed by an independent core laboratory.

Results: Mean patient age was 65.3 ± 13.5 years, with 34 patients (25.6%) ≤60. The mean follow-up was 4.2 ± 1.5 years. Early (≤30 days) and late (>30 days) all-cause mortality were 2.3% (N = 3) and 3.2%/late patients-years (N = 18) respectively. Early events included thromboembolism in 3 patients (2.3%). Late valve-related events included endocarditis in 1 patient, which led to explant, and valve thrombosis in another patient. There were no events of structural valve deterioration throughout the study. At 5 years, mean gradient was 14.8 ± 7.6 mmHg and effective orifice area was 1.4 ± 0.5 cm2, a marked improvement over baseline values. All New York Heart Association class III patients and most class II patients at baseline had improved classifications at 5 years.

Conclusions: The bioprosthesis with RESILIA tissue demonstrated a good safety profile with excellent haemodynamic performance over 5 years of follow-up. These encouraging outcomes warrant additional investigation of this novel tissue.

Clinical trial registration number: NCT01651052.

Keywords: Aortic valve replacement; Bioprosthesis; RESILIA.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Surgical approach undertaken for the study cohort.
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Intraoperative outcomes for the study cohort. The error bars represent ± standard deviation. AVR: aortic valve replacement.
Figure 3:
Figure 3:
Kaplan–Meier curve showing freedom from all-cause mortality and structural valve deterioration. SE: standard error; SVD: structural valve degeneration.
Figure 4:
Figure 4:
(A) Mean gradients in the patient cohort by valve size over the 5 year observational period. (B) Mean effective orifice areas in the patient cohort by valve size and over the 5 year observational period.
Figure 5:
Figure 5:
Central/transvalvular (A), paravalvular (B) and total regurgitation (C) in the study cohort over the 5 year observational study period.
None

Comment in

References

    1. Falk V, Baumgartner H, Bax JJ, De Bonis M , Hamm C, Holm PJ. et al. 2017 ESC/EACTS guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. The task force for the management of valvular heart disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS).Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2017;52:616–64. - PubMed
    1. Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Erwin JP III, Fleisher LA. et al. 2017 AHA/ACC focused update of the 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2017;135:e1159–95. - PubMed
    1. Bartus K, Sadowski J, Litwinowicz R, Filip G, Jasinski M, Deja M. et al. Changing trends in aortic valve procedures over the past ten years-from mechanical prosthesis via stented bioprosthesis to TAVI procedures-analysis of 50,846 aortic valve cases based on a Polish National Cardiac Surgery Database. J Thorac Dis 2019;11:2340–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Litwinowicz R, Bartus K, Drwila R, Kapelak B, Konstanty-Kalandyk J, Sobczynski R. et al. In-hospital mortality in cardiac surgery patients after readmission to the intensive care unit: a single-center experience with 10,992 patients. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2015;29:570–5. - PubMed
    1. Rodriguez-Caulo EA, Macias D, Adsuar A, Ferreiro A, Arias-Dachary J, Parody G. et al. Biological or mechanical prostheses for isolated aortic valve replacement in patients aged 50–65 years: the ANDALVALVE study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2019;55:1160–7. - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data